2023
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.23619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of Point Of Care UltraSound (POCUS) in clinical practice: A retrospective, emergency department based study

Michele Domenico Spampinato,
Francesco Luppi,
Enrico Cristofaro
et al.

Abstract: AimsPoint‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) is the acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound imaging at the bedside to solve specific clinical questions based on signs and symptoms of presentation. While several studies evaluated POCUS diagnostic accuracy for a variety of clinical pictures in the emergency department (ED), only a few data are available on POCUS diagnostic accuracy performed by physicians with different POCUS skills. The objective of this research was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it is a retrospective study conducted in a single centre; second, it only included patients who underwent formal TTE, excluding patients who died before formal TTE or who refused hospital admission; third, it did not include all parameters of RV function mentioned in the ESC guidelines [ 3 ]. However, hyperacute formal TTE is rarely performed in the ED, and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) [ 28 , 29 ] or focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) [ 30 , 31 ] are more easily implemented in this setting. In our opinion, the prognostic role of POCUS or FOCUS must be evaluated separately from the role of formal TTE, since these three examinations are performed with profoundly different echocardiographic instruments and by different experienced providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is a retrospective study conducted in a single centre; second, it only included patients who underwent formal TTE, excluding patients who died before formal TTE or who refused hospital admission; third, it did not include all parameters of RV function mentioned in the ESC guidelines [ 3 ]. However, hyperacute formal TTE is rarely performed in the ED, and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) [ 28 , 29 ] or focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) [ 30 , 31 ] are more easily implemented in this setting. In our opinion, the prognostic role of POCUS or FOCUS must be evaluated separately from the role of formal TTE, since these three examinations are performed with profoundly different echocardiographic instruments and by different experienced providers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, in many areas of inpatient care, mobile, hand-held, pocked-sized ultrasound devices, which are ideal for binary decision-making on clinical questions, have been gaining ground for many years. Their use is also important in time-sensitive urgent cases for rapid, accurate, noninvasive diagnosis and prompt initiation of de nitive therapy, which facilitates improved clinical outcomes [6,7,8]. The last decade has seen an expansion of point-of-care ultrasonography in family medicine in several countries, but not at nearly the same pace as in inpatient care [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%