2021
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.671867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of PET for Differentiating True Glioma Progression From Post Treatment-Related Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PET with different radiotracers and parameters in differentiating between true glioma progression (TPR) and post treatment-related change (PTRC).Methods: Studies on using PET to differentiate between TPR and PTRC were screened from the PubMed and Embase databases. By following the PRISMA checklist, the quality assessment of included studies was performed, the true positive and negative values (TP and TN), false positive and negative values (FP and FN), and genera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…( 95 ) where ++ = high diagnostic accuracy, + = limited diagnostic accuracy, (+) = limited data available, n.a. not applicable (only preliminary/no data available); b Range reported in single studies (S) or meta-analyses (M) reported in ( 92 , 93 , 96 , 97 ). Also shown are some tracers of potential use for this indication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 95 ) where ++ = high diagnostic accuracy, + = limited diagnostic accuracy, (+) = limited data available, n.a. not applicable (only preliminary/no data available); b Range reported in single studies (S) or meta-analyses (M) reported in ( 92 , 93 , 96 , 97 ). Also shown are some tracers of potential use for this indication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for only moderate accuracy in differentiating TP from TRC might be due to a non-homogeneous group of patients because we did not limit our study to high-grade gliomas or specific treatment regimens. As reported in a meta-analysis by Cui et al, the accuracy of FET is known to be higher in high-grade glioma than in the mixed glioma patients group [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 18 F-FET PET can be used to identify pseudoprogression within the first 3 months following chemoradiation therapy with an accuracy of 96% ( Galldiks et al, 2015 ). Regarding the distinction between glioma recurrence and treatment-related changes there is evidence to suggest that the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-MET PET and 18 F-FET PET for differentiating recurrence from treatment-related changes is high with a sensitivity and specificity of 91 and 100% for both tracers ( Grosu et al, 2011 ; Cui et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, a lower tumor-to-normal-uptake (T/N) ratio during AA PET analysis is associated with lower recurrence and longer OS ( Galldiks et al, 2015 ; Patel P. et al, 2017 ; Deuschl et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Imaging For Monitoring Treatment Response and Tumor Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%