2012
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance colonography for the evaluation of disease activity and severity in ulcerative colitis: a prospective study

Abstract: MRC has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of disease activity and severity in UC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-sectional imaging techniques currently have a restricted role in UC ( 62,153,154 ) (CEBM 2). Th us, imaging is not a target in these patients.…”
Section: Endoscopic Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional imaging techniques currently have a restricted role in UC ( 62,153,154 ) (CEBM 2). Th us, imaging is not a target in these patients.…”
Section: Endoscopic Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of diffusion-weighted imaging with magnetic resonance colonography (DWI-MRC)—a technique which assesses changes in water diffusion—has been reported to assist with the detection of colonic inflammation in UC without requiring a bowel preparation [20]. Most MRC protocols do require colonic distension with water or contrast enemas except with DWI-MRC [21]. MRI imaging applications and indications in UC are similar to CT, except bone strength assessments, which have not been validated with MRE.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many North American sites, MR enterography has replaced gastrointestinal fluoroscopy and computed tomography enterography and has become a first-line imaging test for suspected or extant IBD 30. Similarly, MR colonography has shown high accuracy for assessment of disease activity and severity in UC using objective MR imaging parameters including colonic contrast uptake, mural edema, enlarged lymph nodes, and the presence of engorged perienteric vasculature (comb sign) 31. As these MR findings correlate closely with endoscopy, this noninvasive study may be considered as an adjunct or alternative to colonoscopy in selected cases, particularly when colonoscopy is contraindicated or incomplete due to clinically severe illness.…”
Section: Initial Approach In Consideration Of New-onset Ucmentioning
confidence: 99%