2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04465-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging studies for diagnosing root avulsions in post-traumatic upper brachial plexus traction injuries in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar report evaluating magnetic stimulation is needed to compare these methods and to determine whether the combination of both methods is better than either alone. While some imaging methods in human medicine could diagnose nerve root avulsions in TBPI, such as computed tomography myelography and diffusion tensor imaging, 19 , 20 to date, no similar reports exist in veterinary medicine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar report evaluating magnetic stimulation is needed to compare these methods and to determine whether the combination of both methods is better than either alone. While some imaging methods in human medicine could diagnose nerve root avulsions in TBPI, such as computed tomography myelography and diffusion tensor imaging, 19 , 20 to date, no similar reports exist in veterinary medicine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohen suggested the Kappa result should be interpreted as follows: values ≤ 0 indicate no agreement and 0.01-0.20 as none to slight, 0.21-0.40 as fair, 0.41-0.60 as moderate, 0.61-0.80 as substantial, and 0.81-1.00 as almost perfect agreement. κ has been widely used in healthcare research (McHugh, 2012;Tsang et al, 2020;Bordalo-Rodrigues et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La sensibilidad de este estudio para detectar pseudomeningoceles está reportada entre 79% y 86%, con una especificidad de 50% a 97%. 15 16 Según Bordalo-Rodrigues et al, 17 existe una mayor correlación interobservador al evaluar las raíces en TAC con mielografía que en resonancia magnética (RM). Sin embargo, la mayor limitante es lo invasivo de la técnica y la potencial toxicidad del medio de contraste, además de que se han reportado 13 18 pacientes con pseudomeningoceles en ausencia de avulsiones de raíz, así como raíces avulsionada sin formación de pseudomeningoceles.…”
Section: Estudios Adicionalesunclassified
“…Its sensitivity to detect pseudomeningoceles ranges from 79% to 86%, with a specificity ranging from 50% to 97%. 15 16 Bordalo-Rodrigues et al 17 report a higher interobserver correlation in the root evaluation using CT with myelography compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, a major limitation is its invasiveness and the potential toxicity of the contrast medium; in addition, patients with pseudomeningoceles may not present root avulsions, and avulsed roots may not result in pseudomeningoceles.…”
Section: Additional Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%