“…Four studies (10%) included in our meta-analysis had low quality of evidence, 33,38,41,46 27 studies (67.5%) had moderate quality of evidence, [14][15][16][17][20][21][22]24,25,[27][28][29]31,32,34,35,37,39,40,42,44,45,[47][48][49][50][51] and nine studies (22.5%) had high quality of evidence. [11][12][13]18,19,23,26,30,43 Only seven studies [12][13][14]23,32,45,47 used a previously established diagnostic threshold for selecting the appropriate cutoff points. Four studies 17,24,…”