2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-00931-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Serum Concentrations for Differentiating Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage from Ischemic Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 depicts the PRISMA flow diagram for study inclusion in our meta-analysis. Eight studies were included from Germany, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] seven were included from Spain, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] four studies each from China, [26][27][28][29] Republic of Korea [30][31][32][33] and Italy, [34][35][36][37] two studies from India 38,39 and one study each from Greece, 40 Turkey, 41 Czech Republic, 42 United States of America, 43 Taiwan, 44 Sweden, 45 Israel, 46 Kuwait, 47 Croatia, 48 Norway, 49 and Japan 50 were included in our meta-analysis. The publication year of the included studies ranged from 1991 to 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 1 depicts the PRISMA flow diagram for study inclusion in our meta-analysis. Eight studies were included from Germany, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] seven were included from Spain, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] four studies each from China, [26][27][28][29] Republic of Korea [30][31][32][33] and Italy, [34][35][36][37] two studies from India 38,39 and one study each from Greece, 40 Turkey, 41 Czech Republic, 42 United States of America, 43 Taiwan, 44 Sweden, 45 Israel, 46 Kuwait, 47 Croatia, 48 Norway, 49 and Japan 50 were included in our meta-analysis. The publication year of the included studies ranged from 1991 to 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies (10%) included in our meta-analysis had low quality of evidence, 33,38,41,46 27 studies (67.5%) had moderate quality of evidence, [14][15][16][17][20][21][22]24,25,[27][28][29]31,32,34,35,37,39,40,42,44,45,[47][48][49][50][51] and nine studies (22.5%) had high quality of evidence. [11][12][13]18,19,23,26,30,43 Only seven studies [12][13][14]23,32,45,47 used a previously established diagnostic threshold for selecting the appropriate cutoff points. Four studies 17,24,…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are meaningful differences, though the authors are correct to point out various potential weaknesses-such as that patients with intraventricular hemorrhage may have normal GFAP levels (they had none in their cohort), and that small ICH had GFAP levels in the range of patients with ischemic stroke. Absolute separation between ICH and AIS was not present, but at the extremes of GFAP levels, the discrimination was excellent [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%