2017
DOI: 10.17214/gaziaot.294870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of five different techniques for detection of approximal caries

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of five different radiographic methods for the detection of approximal caries on posterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Seventy-two extracted posterior teeth with and without caries were studied. Intraoral bitewing radiographs were taken with film and a storage phosphor-plate system. Extraoral panoramic images were obtained by using the bitewing, orthogonal and standard programs of a digital panoramic radiography device. Images were evaluated by two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To best implement minimal intervention measures, early diagnosis is the primary objective [27]. Conventional bitewings remain the gold standard to diagnose and detect approximal lesions, though they have a low sensitivity for the detection of early lesions extending only to the outer enamel, this ranges from 51 to 64% for enamel lesions and is 67% for caries reaching the enamel-dentin junction (EDJ) [28,29]. This means that 33% of lesions confined to the EDJ may go undiagnosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To best implement minimal intervention measures, early diagnosis is the primary objective [27]. Conventional bitewings remain the gold standard to diagnose and detect approximal lesions, though they have a low sensitivity for the detection of early lesions extending only to the outer enamel, this ranges from 51 to 64% for enamel lesions and is 67% for caries reaching the enamel-dentin junction (EDJ) [28,29]. This means that 33% of lesions confined to the EDJ may go undiagnosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using digital bitewing radiographs for proximal caries detection has quite wide range of sensitivity (53 -93 %) and specificity (67 -93 %) (26)(27)(28)(29). The obtained results may be affected by characteristics and variation of cases included in each study.…”
Section: Sample Size Estimation For Diagnostic Test Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%