2014
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography for rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms

Abstract: EUS has satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for rectal NENs with good sensitivity, but unfavorable specificity, making the differential diagnosis of NENs from other SELs challenging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…83,84 Removal often can be accomplished by snare excision or EMR. 83,85,86 It is unknown whether small, unresected granular cell tumors or larger lesions resected endoscopically should undergo surveillance.…”
Section: Pancreatic Restsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83,84 Removal often can be accomplished by snare excision or EMR. 83,85,86 It is unknown whether small, unresected granular cell tumors or larger lesions resected endoscopically should undergo surveillance.…”
Section: Pancreatic Restsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rectum remains one of the most frequent sites of digestive NETs[1,2]. The treatment of rectal NETs depends on the tumor size and depth of invasion[1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transrectal EUS is the most sensitive method for pre-operative assessment of the stage of rectal tumour advancement; its sensitivity in the assessment of the tumour and invasion of the rectum wall is 76-93%, and of the regional lymph nodes metastases it is 61-88% [62,63].…”
Section: Endoscopic Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 99%