2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma Stratified by Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, conventional ultrasound has certain limitations in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer metastasis. Previous studies ( 8 ) have demonstrated the feasibility of contrast-enhanced (CEUS) in the diagnosis of thyroid malignant nodules. CEUS is widely used to study tumor microcirculation, which is an important feature used to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors and determine the potential to metastasize ( 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional ultrasound has certain limitations in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer metastasis. Previous studies ( 8 ) have demonstrated the feasibility of contrast-enhanced (CEUS) in the diagnosis of thyroid malignant nodules. CEUS is widely used to study tumor microcirculation, which is an important feature used to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors and determine the potential to metastasize ( 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to be misled and misdiagnosed. For this reason, it is necessary to perform imaging screening at the early stage of TT and conduct research and investigation for TT [ 3 , 4 ]. CEUS, as an important clinical imaging diagnostic method, has been promoted and expanded because of its meticulous imaging observation of TT and clear tumor nodules [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate differential diagnosis can avoid unnecessary FNA or surgery for benign nodules. Hu [11] 2013 China a Prospective 51/57 20/31 47.4 ± 12.2 SonoVue (1.2 mL) c or d Chen et al [12] 2014 China a Prospective 216/258 49/167 NA SonoVue (1.0-1.2 mL) c Yan et al [13] 2014 China a Prospective NA/138 NA NA SonoVue (1.2 mL) c Li et al [8] 2015 China a Retrospective 73/80 21/52 39.5 ± 11.3 SonoVue (2.4 mL) c Wang et al [14] 2015 China a Prospective 98/109 30/68 44.8 ± 10.8 SonoVue (NA) c Yang [15] 2016 China a Retrospective 69/107 14/55 45.5 ± 8.4 NA c Ma et al [16] 2016 China a Prospective 125/135 NA 48.6 ± 12.0 SonoVue (2.4 mL) c Xu et al [17] 2017 China a Prospective 161/175 29/132 46.2 ± 15.2 SonoVue (2.5 mL) c or d Xu et al [18] 2017 China a Prospective 59/85 22/37 46.5 ± 3.3 SonoVue (NA) c or d Li [19] 2018 China a Prospective 154/185 27/127 48.7 ± 12.8 SonoVue (2.0 mL) c or d He et al [20] 2018 China a Prospective 496/564 228/268 39.2 ± 11.6 SonoVue (1.8 mL) c Jia [21] 2018 China a Retrospective 100/113 31/69 44.8 ± 9.8 SonoVue (2.4 mL) c Hao et al [22] 2019 China a Prospective 97/107 54/43 45.3 ± 3.7 SonoVue (NA) c Ci [23] 2019 China a Prospective 161/183 53/108 43.9 ± 11.1 SonoVue (2.4 mL) c Huang et al [24] 2019 [26] 2022 China b Prospective 45/60 14/31 47.6 ± 14.7 SonoVue (2.0 mL) c Tu [27] 2020 China a Prospective 40/58 16/24 48.2 ± 3.7 SonoVue (2.4 mL) c Wu [28] 2020 China a Prospective 60/60 19/41 50.0 ± 7.8 SonoVue (1.5 mL) c Liu et al [29] 2020 China a Retrospective 98/109 53/45 45.7 ± 8.1 SonoVue (NA) c or d Li [30] 2020 China a Prospective 75/93 29/46 38.7 ± 10.1 SonoVue (2.4 mL) c Peng and Cheng [31] 2020 China a Prospective 92/108 36/56 42.6 ± 10.6 NA (1.0 mL) c or d Zhang [32] 2020 China a Prospective 80/80 36/44 46.5 ± 5.8 Gd-DTPA (NA) c Liang [33] 2020 China a Prospective 106/106 NA NA NA (5.0 mL) c Wu et al [34] 2021 China a Retrospective 98/105 33/65 39 (18-67) SonoVue (2.0 mL) c Chen and Li [35] 2021 China a Prospective 65/74 25/40 42.0 ± 12.1 SonoVue (1.5 mL) c Zheng et al [36] 2021 China a Retrospective 92/106 40/52 45.0 ± 2.2 SonoVue (1.5 mL) c Li [37] 2021 China a Prospective 115/128 18/97 46.3 ± 6.5 SonoVue (2...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%