2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0651-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients

Abstract: CTA is the most accurate technique for evaluating carotid stenoses, with a slightly better performance than MRA (97% vs. 95% for SS MRA and 92% for FP MRA) and a greater accuracy than CDUS (97% vs. 76%). Blood-pool contrast-enhanced SS sequences offer improved evaluation of degree of stenosis and plaque morphology with accuracy substantially identical to CTA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous comparative study of DSA evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CDUS, CT angiography (CTA) and blood-pool-enhanced MRA in the assessment of 170 patients with CS. Consistent with the present study findings, it was observed that CTA was the most accurate technique for evaluating CS, with CTA exhibiting a marginally higher accuracy than MRA (97% for CTA vs. 95% for steady-state MRA and 92% for first-pass MRA) and a markedly greater accuracy than CDUS (97 vs. 76%, respectively) (25). In addition to the established contraindications of MRA such as cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implants, magnetic resonance imaging, brain pacemakers and false teeth, MRI motion artifacts arising from patient movements may limit the accuracy of enhanced MRA.…”
Section: Degree Of Degree Of Stenosis By Dsa Stenosis ---------------supporting
confidence: 91%
“…A previous comparative study of DSA evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CDUS, CT angiography (CTA) and blood-pool-enhanced MRA in the assessment of 170 patients with CS. Consistent with the present study findings, it was observed that CTA was the most accurate technique for evaluating CS, with CTA exhibiting a marginally higher accuracy than MRA (97% for CTA vs. 95% for steady-state MRA and 92% for first-pass MRA) and a markedly greater accuracy than CDUS (97 vs. 76%, respectively) (25). In addition to the established contraindications of MRA such as cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implants, magnetic resonance imaging, brain pacemakers and false teeth, MRI motion artifacts arising from patient movements may limit the accuracy of enhanced MRA.…”
Section: Degree Of Degree Of Stenosis By Dsa Stenosis ---------------supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although CTA has a higher resolution than MRA, both detect lumen stenosis with a similar, high accuracy compared with DSA. 6 In addition, plaque density on CTA is a poor IPH predictor. 15 It is clear from this research that stroke source workup is incomplete if one uses only lumen information from CTA or MRA without IPH-sensitive sequences, such as MPRAGE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are as accurate as digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in determining lumen stenosis and both much more accurate than duplex ultrasound. 6 Carotid plaque ulceration has long been an indicator for surgery but can be difficult to detect with DSA. 7 Ulceration can be detected with CTA at a threshold of ≥2 mm with high sensitivity (87%) and specificity (99%) compared with histology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Anzidei et al 31 reported that CTA was the most accurate technique for evaluating carotid stenosis in a large study group (n ϭ 170 patients), with a slightly better performance than MRA (97% versus 95% for steady-state MRA and 92% for first-pass MRA) and a greater accuracy than color Doppler ultrasonography (97% versus 76%). Although patients scheduled for carotid artery imaging are predominantly in the higher age group and radiation exposure is thought to be less critical, the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept should still be followed, and a variety of dose-reduction techniques in CT imaging have become available in recent years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%