2022
DOI: 10.1111/echo.15280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy of cardiopulmonary ultrasound for pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background Cardiopulmonary ultrasound has shown varying results in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism patients around the world. Hence, the current review was done to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiopulmonary ultrasound for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among suspected patients. Methods We conducted a systematic search for all studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of cardiopulmonary ultrasound for pulmonary embolism in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane library from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis performed by Cao et al that included 4216 patients in 10 studies reported that the pooled sensitivity of cardiopulmonary ultrasound for PE was 77% (50%–92%, 95% CI) and specificity was 99% (97%–100%, 95% CI) [ 29 ]. Another meta-analysis by Kagima et al which included 3872 patients in seven studies, reported that using cardiopulmonary ultrasound had 91% sensitivity and 81% specificity for the diagnosis of PE compared with the gold standard CTPA [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis performed by Cao et al that included 4216 patients in 10 studies reported that the pooled sensitivity of cardiopulmonary ultrasound for PE was 77% (50%–92%, 95% CI) and specificity was 99% (97%–100%, 95% CI) [ 29 ]. Another meta-analysis by Kagima et al which included 3872 patients in seven studies, reported that using cardiopulmonary ultrasound had 91% sensitivity and 81% specificity for the diagnosis of PE compared with the gold standard CTPA [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study explores the potential of an expanded role for ultrasound in PE diagnostics, but further studies with greater statistical power are essential to conclusively determine its precision and safety. A systematic review covering studies on the possible role of ultrasound in PE diagnostics showed that cardiopulmonary ultrasound could supplement existing diagnostic imaging as a non-invasive method and play a role in PE diagnosis, but further research is needed to determine the ideal setup and how ultrasound will play a role within the context of PE [ 33 ].…”
Section: Group 101: Clinical Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%