Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Noninvasive imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET), have been involved in increasing evolution to detect RCC. This meta-analysis aims to compare to compare the value of MRI, SPECT, and PET in the diagnosis of RCC, and to provide evidence for decision-making in terms of further research and clinical settings.Methods: Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systemically searched. Studies concerning MRI, SPECT, and PET for the detection of RCC were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with their respective 95% confidence interval (CIs) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) were calculated.Results: A total of 44 articles were finally detected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of MRI, SPECT, and PET were 0.80, 0.81, and 0.88, respectively. Their respective overall specificities were 0.90, 0.54, and 0.87. Results in the subgroup analysis of the performance of SPECT that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the prospective SPECT studies included were 0.80, 0.42, 0.80, respectively. In the analysis of 18F-FDG PET, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.88, 0.86, and 0.92, respectively. PET studies showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.80, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively in the diagnosis of primary RCC. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of PET studies in detecting recurrent or metastatic RCC were 0.93, 0.88, and 0.94.Conclusion: Our meta-analysis manifests that MRI and PET present better diagnostic value for the detection of RCC in comparison with SPECT. PET is superior in the diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic RCC.