2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic accuracy and distress associated with oropharyngeal suction in cystic fibrosis

Abstract: OPS has diagnostic utility in determining the absence of organisms in the lower airway, with specificity for P.aeruginosa detection of 98%. However, a positive OPS result is not necessarily a good indicator of lower airway infection. Distress levels were high during OPS, mostly in 2 and 3year olds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants in the younger cohort had annual bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) as part of an annual surveillance programme separate to this study, and some participants in the older cohort also had additional BAL in 10 instances for clinical reasons (respiratory or symptomatic deterioration). Participants undergoing BAL were asked to provide a paired flocked nasal swab sample, OPS and BAL sample . In a subset of these participants, a DAR™ barrier filter (Covidien) (used to filter exhaled air from the ventilatory circuit during each bronchoscopy) was collected following each procedure for viral analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants in the younger cohort had annual bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) as part of an annual surveillance programme separate to this study, and some participants in the older cohort also had additional BAL in 10 instances for clinical reasons (respiratory or symptomatic deterioration). Participants undergoing BAL were asked to provide a paired flocked nasal swab sample, OPS and BAL sample . In a subset of these participants, a DAR™ barrier filter (Covidien) (used to filter exhaled air from the ventilatory circuit during each bronchoscopy) was collected following each procedure for viral analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants undergoing BAL were asked to provide a paired flocked nasal swab sample, OPS and BAL sample. 11 In a subset of these participants, a DAR™ barrier filter (Covidien) (used to filter exhaled air from the ventilatory circuit during each bronchoscopy) was collected following each procedure for viral analysis.…”
Section: Participants and Participant Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, direct lung sampling in infants with CF by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) [8] would be most representative of the local presence and relative abundance of respiratory pathogens within LRT microbial communities. However, 1) because of the invasive nature of BAL, 2) because infants and young children with CF do not spontaneously expectorate sputum and 3) because of the lack of practical experience with obtaining induced sputum in these patients [8,9], clinicians generally use alternative specimens including nasal, nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) samples for microbial surveillance [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Recent cross-sectional studies [16,17] in older children with CF have shown that the upper and lower airways on average harbour similar bacterial communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture-based detection of P. aeruginosa in respiratory samples is the current gold standard for infection confirmation [27]. In children acquisition of sputum is not always possible and induced sputum, deep throat swabs or aspirates are used as a surrogate [1012, 14]. Non invasive methods that could complement isolation of P. aeruginosa for earlier detection of infection in children with CF would be beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%