2017
DOI: 10.1167/tvst.6.3.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Ability and Repeatability of a New Supra-Threshold Glaucoma Screening Program in Standard Automated Perimetry

Abstract: PurposeWe assess the diagnostic ability and repeatability of a new suprathreshold glaucoma screening test (GST) comprising 28 test points and a 1-of-3 sampling strategy at 95% of the normal limit for standard automated perimetry (SAP) in early to advanced glaucoma.MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study included 96 eyes of patients with early, moderate, or advanced glaucoma and 37 eyes of normal controls. Participants were evaluated by the G-Dynamic threshold test once and the GST twice, in random order,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slit lamp biomicroscopy and ophthalmoscopy were conducted to ensure the absence of ocular pathology and those with cataract grading above 1 in The Lens Opacities Classification System III were not included in the study ( Chylack et al, 1993 ). A supra-threshold glaucoma screening test (white-on-white Goldmann Size III targets) was performed using the Octopus 600 perimeter (Haag-Streit AG, Köniz, Switzerland) ( Takahashi et al, 2017 ; Turpin, Myers, & McKendrick, 2016 ) and only those participants with no visual field defects were included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slit lamp biomicroscopy and ophthalmoscopy were conducted to ensure the absence of ocular pathology and those with cataract grading above 1 in The Lens Opacities Classification System III were not included in the study ( Chylack et al, 1993 ). A supra-threshold glaucoma screening test (white-on-white Goldmann Size III targets) was performed using the Octopus 600 perimeter (Haag-Streit AG, Köniz, Switzerland) ( Takahashi et al, 2017 ; Turpin, Myers, & McKendrick, 2016 ) and only those participants with no visual field defects were included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%