2019
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis-specific WBRT-30-CRC Score for Estimating Survival of Patients Irradiated for Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Background/Aim: Existing survival scores for patients with brain metastases were created in heterogeneously treated cohorts. A new score was developed in 56 patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer treated with 10×3 Gy of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Patients and Methods: Factors found significantly associated with survival (p<0.05) or showing a trend (p<0.08) were included in the tool. The new WBRT-30-CRC was compared to diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) classification … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the new score, the difference between the 0 points (poor prognosis) and the 1-point group (intermediate prognosis) was significant (p = 0.010, two-tailed Fisher's exact test); a trend (p = 0.087) was found for the difference between the 1-point and the 2-points group (favorable prognosis). The differences between the poor-prognosis and the intermediate-prognosis group was significant for the Evers-Score (p = 0.006) but not for DS-GPA (p = 0.118), WBRT-30-CRC (p = 0.444), or Dziggel-Score (p = 1.000) groups [12][13][14][15][16]. A trend regarding the difference between the intermediate-prognosis and the favorable-prognosis group was found for the WBRT-30-CRC (p = 0.072).…”
Section: Comparison Of the New Score To Existing Toolsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the new score, the difference between the 0 points (poor prognosis) and the 1-point group (intermediate prognosis) was significant (p = 0.010, two-tailed Fisher's exact test); a trend (p = 0.087) was found for the difference between the 1-point and the 2-points group (favorable prognosis). The differences between the poor-prognosis and the intermediate-prognosis group was significant for the Evers-Score (p = 0.006) but not for DS-GPA (p = 0.118), WBRT-30-CRC (p = 0.444), or Dziggel-Score (p = 1.000) groups [12][13][14][15][16]. A trend regarding the difference between the intermediate-prognosis and the favorable-prognosis group was found for the WBRT-30-CRC (p = 0.072).…”
Section: Comparison Of the New Score To Existing Toolsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The 6-month survival probabilities of the prognostic groups of the new score, DS-GPA classification [12,13], Dziggel-Score [14], WBRT-30-CRC [15], and Evers-Score [16] are summarized in Table 3. The positive predictive values (PPVs) for the poor-prognosis groups to accurately identify patients who died within 6 months were 100% (new score), 100% (Evers-Score), 91% (WBRT-30-CRC), 87% (DS-GPA classification) and 86% (Dziggel-Score), respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of the New Score To Existing Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is important to identify prognostic factors in patients with bone metastases for each tumor type. This has already been performed for other situations, such as metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) and brain metastases (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The present study was performed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with OS in patients irradiated for bone metastases from kidney cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%