2022
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis, prevalence, and outcomes of sarcopenia in kidney transplantation recipients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: The prevalence of sarcopenia and its clinical predictors and clinical impact vary among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), in part because of different diagnostic criteria. This study aimed to assess the reported diagnosis criteria of sarcopenia and compare them in terms of prevalence, clinical predictors, and impact of sarcopenia. The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for the full-length reports published until 28 January 2022. The subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and sensitivity analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(347 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At baseline, the number of KTRs with LMM was 109 (31.9%), similar to a previous meta-analysis on sarcopenia in KTRs; the prevalence of sarcopenia defined based on LMM was 34% [30]. There were 93 KTRs with osteoporosis (27.2%) in our study, which was also similar to the prevalence of osteoporosis reported in a previous study regarding KTRs (11-56%) [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At baseline, the number of KTRs with LMM was 109 (31.9%), similar to a previous meta-analysis on sarcopenia in KTRs; the prevalence of sarcopenia defined based on LMM was 34% [30]. There were 93 KTRs with osteoporosis (27.2%) in our study, which was also similar to the prevalence of osteoporosis reported in a previous study regarding KTRs (11-56%) [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Rates of malnutrition vary among patients requiring kidney transplantation, depending on patient age, sex, duration of dialysis, type of dialysis, and presence of other comorbidities, as well as the nutrition assessment parameters chosen. Sarcopenia, as a marker of reduced muscle mass, has been found to be prevalent (34%) among kidney transplant recipients; however, no consistent association has been found between sarcopenia and rejection, infection, graft function, hospital length of stay, or mortality 24,25 . Conversely, in kidney transplant recipients >60 years old, low skeletal muscle index (<42 cm 2 /m 2 , not adjusted for sex) was associated with prolonged length of stay, increased wound complications, and reduced graft/patient survival, but only in male patients 26 .…”
Section: Nutrition Factors Associated With Risks For Negative Postope...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarcopenia, as a marker of reduced muscle mass, has been found to be prevalent (34%) among kidney transplant recipients; however, no consistent association has been found between sarcopenia and rejection, infection, graft function, hospital length of stay, or mortality. 24,25 Conversely, in kidney transplant recipients >60 years old, low skeletal muscle index (<42 cm 2 /m 2 , not adjusted for sex) was associated with prolonged length of stay, increased wound complications, and reduced graft/patient survival, but only in male patients. 26 Myosteatosis (fat infiltration of muscle, signifying poor muscle quality) has been independently associated with posttransplant mortality in kidney recipients.…”
Section: Kidney Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results found that average age had no impact on the sarcopenia prevalence among CVDs and general population, with the results of regression coefficient being 0.00078 [(95% CI: À0.0048 to 0.006), P = 0.775] for CVD and regression coefficient being 0.0045 [(95% CI: À0.003 to 0.0046), P = 0.817] for general population, which was consistent with previous of meta-analysis for pooling the prevalence sarcopenia among patients with mechanical ventilation 2 or kidney transplantation recipients. 3 To conclude, the authors did a great systematic review and meta-analysis which focusing the important CVDs population. Their study brings great attention of sarcopenia for CVDs, given the high prevalence of sarcopenia among this special population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%