2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-014-1836-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of  Wireless Sensor Networks in Presence of Permanent and Intermittent Faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular approaches are comparison-based, 7 neighboring coordination-based, 6 probabilistic neural network-based, 10 statistical-based, 5 and neural network-based approach. The most popular approaches are comparison-based, 7 neighboring coordination-based, 6 probabilistic neural network-based, 10 statistical-based, 5 and neural network-based approach.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most popular approaches are comparison-based, 7 neighboring coordination-based, 6 probabilistic neural network-based, 10 statistical-based, 5 and neural network-based approach. The most popular approaches are comparison-based, 7 neighboring coordination-based, 6 probabilistic neural network-based, 10 statistical-based, 5 and neural network-based approach.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To diagnose the faulty sensor nodes, there are various types of fault diagnosis algorithms available in the literature, which are based on different approaches such as statistics, 5 neighboring coordination, 6 comparison based, 7 and neural network. To diagnose the faulty sensor nodes, there are various types of fault diagnosis algorithms available in the literature, which are based on different approaches such as statistics, 5 neighboring coordination, 6 comparison based, 7 and neural network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Panda and Khilar in their works 13,14 proposed distributed fault diagnosis for WSN using a statistical method with neighboring coordination approach to detect hard, soft, and byzantine faults in WSN. Sahoo et al 15 proposed a distributed fault diagnosis protocol for WSN using a comparison of sensor measurements of neighboring nodes to detect permanent and intermittent faults in WSN. Elhadef et al 16 proposed a system level comparison-based fault diagnosis for an ad hoc network using neural network approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many faults are not permanent, and a few types of such non-permanent faults are called intermittent faults (IFs). IFs exist widely in practical systems, including electronic equipment [21], spacecraft [22], mechanical devices [23], and communication systems [24], and they threaten system reliability and security. The intermittent nature of a fault is reflected in the fact that it can recover without any corrective action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%