Diagnosis of union of distal tibia fractures: Accuracy and interobserver reliability

Kollenburg, Johan A.P.A.C. van; Vrahas, Mark; Smith, R. M.; Guitton, Thierry G.; Ring, David

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.034

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…29,37 We compared staging systems and subgroups using the Z test, as previously described by our group. 5,6,11,12,[14][15][16][17][18]32,40,42,45 Results Participants Twenty-six of the 32 observers supervised surgical trainees, and 62% were in practice 6 years or more. Demographics of the observers are reported in Table I.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum: reliability of four classification systems using radiographs and computed tomography

Claessen

Ende

Doornberg

et al. 2015

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum: reliability of four classification systems using radiographs and computed tomography

Claessen

Ende

Doornberg

et al. 2015

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery: Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to compare the observer participation and satisfaction as well as interobserver reliability between two online platforms, Science of Variation Group (SOVG) and Traumaplatform Study Collaborative, for the evaluation of complex tibial plateau fractures using computed tomography in MPEG4 and DICOM format. A total of 143 observers started with the online evaluation of 15 complex tibial plateau fractures via either the SOVG or Traumaplatform Study Collaborative websites using MPEG4 videos or a DICOM viewer, respectively. Observers were asked to indicate the absence or presence of four tibial plateau fracture characteristics and to rate their satisfaction with the evaluation as provided by the respective online platforms. The observer participation rate was significantly higher in the SOVG (MPEG4 video) group compared to that in the Traumaplatform Study Collaborative (DICOM viewer) group (75 and 43%, respectively; P < 0.001). The median observer satisfaction with the online evaluation was seven (range, 0-10) using MPEG4 video compared to six (range, 1-9) using DICOM viewer (P = 0.11). The interobserver reliability for recognition of fracture characteristics in complex tibial plateau fractures was higher for the evaluation using MPEG4 video. In conclusion, observer participation and interobserver reliability for the characterization of tibial plateau fractures was greater with MPEG4 videos than with a standard DICOM viewer, while there was no difference in observer satisfaction. Future reliability studies should account for the method of delivering images.

show abstract

The Kappa Paradox Explained

Derksen,

Bruinsma,

Goslings

et al. 2024

The Journal of Hand Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diagnosis of union of distal tibia fractures: Accuracy and interobserver reliability

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum: reliability of four classification systems using radiographs and computed tomography

Osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum: reliability of four classification systems using radiographs and computed tomography

Online Studies on Variation in Orthopedic Surgery: Computed Tomography in MPEG4 Versus DICOM Format

The Kappa Paradox Explained

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About