Diagnosis of tooth ankylosis using panoramic views, cone beam computed tomography, and histological data: a retrospective observational case series study
Abstract:CBCT images can be a useful adjunctive diagnostic tool to diagnose ankylosed teeth, but cannot be recommended as a single diagnostic modality as false positive results were found.
“…When comparing the findings of periapical radiographs and CBCT, most of the replacement and cervical root resorptions detected in this study are not visible using 2D imaging (Table 3). This is corroborated by existing research, where CBCT yielded higher sensitivity than intraoral radiographs in the diagnosis of external root resorptions [39,40]. However, findings deemed inconclusive by the PI were found more frequently in the assessment of CBCTs than of PAs.…”
Objectives
To assess survival rates and frequency of complications for immature and mature autotransplanted teeth after at least 1 year in function.
Materials and methods
All consecutive patients who had undergone tooth autotransplantation between 2000 and 2018 were invited to a clinical and radiographic follow-up examination. First, survival rates were calculated on the basis of a phone inquiry. A clinical follow-up examination allowed for the calculation of the success rate, i.e., absence of any potentially adverse clinical and radiographic findings of the autotransplanted teeth. Moreover, the effect of demographic, dental, and surgical variables on survival/success was analyzed statistically.
Results
Thirty-eight teeth in 35 patients were transplanted during the study period. Three teeth in 3 patients were excluded due to missing records. All other patients were successfully contacted and interviewed by phone. Out of these 35 transplants, 32 were still in function, and 3 had been extracted, yielding a 91.4% survival probability after a median follow-up of 3.4 years. Of the 32 teeth qualifying for the success analysis, 20 (62.5%) showed absence of potentially adverse findings, while 3 (9.4%) required root canal treatment (RCT). Out of the 9 mature, root-end resected transplants, 4 exhibited ongoing pulp canal obliteration, all with a single root canal. Postoperative and potentially adverse findings or failures were found more frequently in the group of mature transplants (55.6%) than immature transplants (30.4%) and for molars (72.7%) than premolars (17.6%) or canines (25%). None of the potential predictors had a statistically significant effect on survival or success.
Conclusion
Autotransplanted teeth yielded a satisfying midterm survival rate regardless of their stage of development. An additional, extraoral root-end resection of mature transplants may lead to rates of revascularization and postoperative pulp canal obliteration higher than the data reported on unmodified mature transplants.
Clinical relevance
Extraoral root-end resection of mature teeth shows promising outcomes for transplants especially with a single root canal and uncomplicated root morphology.
“…When comparing the findings of periapical radiographs and CBCT, most of the replacement and cervical root resorptions detected in this study are not visible using 2D imaging (Table 3). This is corroborated by existing research, where CBCT yielded higher sensitivity than intraoral radiographs in the diagnosis of external root resorptions [39,40]. However, findings deemed inconclusive by the PI were found more frequently in the assessment of CBCTs than of PAs.…”
Objectives
To assess survival rates and frequency of complications for immature and mature autotransplanted teeth after at least 1 year in function.
Materials and methods
All consecutive patients who had undergone tooth autotransplantation between 2000 and 2018 were invited to a clinical and radiographic follow-up examination. First, survival rates were calculated on the basis of a phone inquiry. A clinical follow-up examination allowed for the calculation of the success rate, i.e., absence of any potentially adverse clinical and radiographic findings of the autotransplanted teeth. Moreover, the effect of demographic, dental, and surgical variables on survival/success was analyzed statistically.
Results
Thirty-eight teeth in 35 patients were transplanted during the study period. Three teeth in 3 patients were excluded due to missing records. All other patients were successfully contacted and interviewed by phone. Out of these 35 transplants, 32 were still in function, and 3 had been extracted, yielding a 91.4% survival probability after a median follow-up of 3.4 years. Of the 32 teeth qualifying for the success analysis, 20 (62.5%) showed absence of potentially adverse findings, while 3 (9.4%) required root canal treatment (RCT). Out of the 9 mature, root-end resected transplants, 4 exhibited ongoing pulp canal obliteration, all with a single root canal. Postoperative and potentially adverse findings or failures were found more frequently in the group of mature transplants (55.6%) than immature transplants (30.4%) and for molars (72.7%) than premolars (17.6%) or canines (25%). None of the potential predictors had a statistically significant effect on survival or success.
Conclusion
Autotransplanted teeth yielded a satisfying midterm survival rate regardless of their stage of development. An additional, extraoral root-end resection of mature transplants may lead to rates of revascularization and postoperative pulp canal obliteration higher than the data reported on unmodified mature transplants.
Clinical relevance
Extraoral root-end resection of mature teeth shows promising outcomes for transplants especially with a single root canal and uncomplicated root morphology.
“…Dental ankylosis is rare. It is calcified PDL and may occur in traumatized or avulsed teeth that are replanted in the socket (10,11). This can be the result of the removal of a tooth and reseating the tooth in the socket.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient should be informed of this possibility. Nonetheless, securing a diagnosis of ankylosis may be difficult even with cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) (11).…”
An infected tooth that may be deemed unrestorable and may be salvaged by
atraumatic removal, an in-hand apicoectomy and retrograde seal, then
replantation. Extraction, placing an apical seal and replantation of
teeth is not new, nonetheless, clinicians may need to be reminded of
this procedure.
“…On the other hand, three-dimensional CBCT has high sensitivity and slightly lower specificity in relation to diagnosis of foci of ankylosis ( Fig. 4) (38). Ankylosis of a canine positioned inside the bone has also been considered as an indication for its extraction, if there are no conditions to conduct autotransplantation (37).…”
Section: Review and Discussion Extraction Of An Impacted Toothmentioning
Orthodontic movement of a maxillary canine into the dental arch may be a therapeutic challenge, and it is necessary to analyse a case in detail and to evaluate therapeutic methods, including a difficult decision of tooth extraction in all cases.<b> Aim</b>. The paper aims to discuss orthodontic indications for maxillary canine extraction based on available literature. <b>Material and methods</b>. The PubMed database and the following key words were used for studies: canine impaction, maxillary impacted canine and canine extraction. Literature was supplemented with publications from reviewed journals not included in the PubMed database. 50 papers were selected from the literature list. <b>Results, review and discussion</b>. A decision to extract a maxillary canine should be made based on a detailed clinical examination and analysis of orthodontic records, including photographs, diagnostic models and radiological scans. CBCT imaging test should be performed as standard before treatment in case of impaired tooth eruption. Factors that should be especially considered include: tooth anatomy, periodontal status, position in the bone, occlusion, condition of the adjacent teeth and any pathological processes in the tooth vicinity. Before making a therapeutic decision a patient should be informed about available therapeutic options according to current medical knowledge, as well as about advantages and disadvantages of each of them. <b>Summary</b>. Factors favouring extraction of impacted canines or canines with impaired eruption include: unfavourable position (a horizontal position of a tooth in the bone, position in the zone IV and V according to Kurol, large distance from the edge of the alveolar process), anatomical abnormality (root angulation, external or internal resorption), root ankylosis, patient’s age above 30 years and good occlusion without a canine in the dental arch with the need to extract a premolar for its movement into the dental arch. <b>(Baszak J, Sobieszczańska A, Dunin-Wilczyńska I. Indications for extraction of permanent maxillary canines – a literature review. Orthod Forum 2018; 14: 130-42)</b>.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.