2021
DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Skull Base Osteomyelitis

Abstract: Skull base osteomyelitis (SBO) is an infection of the temporal, sphenoid, or occipital bone that can be a challenge to diagnose because of its nonspecific symptoms, long clinical course, and radiologic findings that mimic those of other entities. The authors review this unusual infection on the basis of six proven cases. The diagnosis of SBO should be made according to four points: a high index of clinical suspicion, radiologic evidence of infection, repeated biopsies that are negative for malignancy, and posi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 This is sometimes referred to as extrasinonasal LoCE lesion 7 and not encountered in bacterial SBO. 20 Abscess formation seen in bacterial SBO is not a feature of fungal SBO. Thus, necrosis or tissue infarction are features of fungal SBO contrasting with suppuration, which is the hallmark of bacterial/pyogenic SBO.…”
Section: Radiological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…19 This is sometimes referred to as extrasinonasal LoCE lesion 7 and not encountered in bacterial SBO. 20 Abscess formation seen in bacterial SBO is not a feature of fungal SBO. Thus, necrosis or tissue infarction are features of fungal SBO contrasting with suppuration, which is the hallmark of bacterial/pyogenic SBO.…”
Section: Radiological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unfortunately, radiological findings may lead to an erroneous diagnosis as well because the radiologic features of GPA often overlap with those of other diseases [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]29], delaying the time to diagnosis [3,23,[29][30][31]. Accordingly, it is not surprising that there have been several case reports published on GPA cases in which the MRI findings mimicked those of SBO or NPC [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]29], or that, to date, no studies have identified MRI findings possessing diagnostic value for differentiating between these diseases. Nevertheless, the advent of high-resolution MRI has facilitated a more detailed assessment of the imaging characteristics and the extent of such lesions, and the diagnostic role of MRI is expanding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the margin of the lesion was mostly partially defined in cases of NPC, whereas it was mostly poorly defined in cases of GPA and SBO. Since GPA and SBO are characterized by inflammatory pathologies, they must be considered infiltrative in nature [8,[14][15][16][17][18]29]. In contrast, NPC lesions are typically more defined; however, since we enrolled patients with NPC of clinical tumor stage 3 or higher, most of the NPC lesions were only partially defined, probably due to the skull base infiltration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 Anterior, central, and posterior SBOs were categorized according to skull base anatomy—anterior clinoid process and lesser wing of sphenoid constitute anterior, greater wing of sphenoid and petrous part of temporal bone denote central, and clivus involvement is indicative of posterior SBO. 7 CN palsy was classified as single or multiple and in case of multiple, the patients were further categorized as predominantly upper CN palsy (I–VI) or lower CN palsy (VII–XII) or both. All patients with postoperative involvement of temporal bone flap and posttraumatic or iatrogenic osteomyelitis of skull base were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%