2014
DOI: 10.1080/21580103.2014.931257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of plant nutrient and growth responses on fertilization with vector analysis and morphological index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where SD is seedling dry weight (g), HD is height (cm) to rcD ratio (mm), and SR is shoot dry weight (g) to root dry weight (g) ratio (Deans et al 1989;Bayala et al 2009;Park et al 2015).…”
Section: Dickson's Quality Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where SD is seedling dry weight (g), HD is height (cm) to rcD ratio (mm), and SR is shoot dry weight (g) to root dry weight (g) ratio (Deans et al 1989;Bayala et al 2009;Park et al 2015).…”
Section: Dickson's Quality Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JM 218 and N 5 Ns30RF that produced more values of growth parameter and showed superiority over other treatments, which might have brought significant differences under these (JM 218 and N 5 ) treatments. Appropriate N management caused significant effect on plant height, root length, stem diameter, shoot dry matter and total dry matter which resulted in higher DQI value [58,59]. According to Dias et al [60] suitable cultivar selection, better management of nitrogen, and increasing nitrogen doses have produced higher values of DQI.…”
Section: Mineral Content (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where SD is seedling dry weight (g), HD is height (cm) to rcD ratio (mm), and SR is shoot to root dry weight ratio (Deans et al 1989;Bayala et al 2009;Park et al 2015).…”
Section: Dickson's Quality Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%