1987
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90228-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of penetrating cervical esophageal injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
6

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
33
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The contrast radiology of the upper gastrointestinal series did not show contrast runoff occurrences, in any of the specimens investigated, or any type of lesion that was visible even after the conduction of subsequent necropsy 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The contrast radiology of the upper gastrointestinal series did not show contrast runoff occurrences, in any of the specimens investigated, or any type of lesion that was visible even after the conduction of subsequent necropsy 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The aim of contras radiology is the generation of radiological findings that may demonstrate changes as stenosis, fistulas, pervisouness of anasotmoses, and diverticula 14 . Some authors report the deformities of the esophagus after contrast investigation in Barret's esophagus, which may assist in the screening of patients with gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms 5,7,8,13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several authors, induding Borwiecki et ai, 7 Goudarzi et ai, 8 Gulbrandson et al, 9 Spenler and Benfield, Penetrating injuries of the cervical oeso- phagus are relatively more common than the other types of injuries; however, not all penetrating injuries cause a spinal injury or fracture. [20][21][22] The above authors emphasize the serious ness of the oesophageal injury, the life threatening complications, and the difficul ties of diagnosis and management. Most authors also report that the available diag nostic techniques are not always helpful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%