2007
DOI: 10.1309/3qr4fc5ppwxa7n29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Metastatic Melanoma by Fine-Needle Biopsy

Abstract: Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has been reported as a rapid, minimally invasive technique for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma. The diagnostic accuracy of FNB was assessed in a consecutive series of 2,204 FNBs of clinically suspicious lesions from patients with previous primary melanomas treated at the Sydney Melanoma Unit, Sydney, Australia, between January 1992 and December 2002. The sensitivity and specificity of FNB were 96.3% and 98.9%, respectively. There were 5 false-positive cases (0.6%), which were veri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Melanomas can be readily diagnosed by cytomorphology alone since most of the cases present with typical features such as dispersed cell population of plasmacytoid to polygonal cells with intracytoplasmic melanin pigment, intranuclear inclusions and the presence of macronucleoli [7,8]. However, it is not unusual for this tumor to display divergent cellular morphology which frequently poses a diagnostic problem, especially if the clinical history is not suggestive or immunological markers are not available [3,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Melanomas can be readily diagnosed by cytomorphology alone since most of the cases present with typical features such as dispersed cell population of plasmacytoid to polygonal cells with intracytoplasmic melanin pigment, intranuclear inclusions and the presence of macronucleoli [7,8]. However, it is not unusual for this tumor to display divergent cellular morphology which frequently poses a diagnostic problem, especially if the clinical history is not suggestive or immunological markers are not available [3,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spindle cell melanomas do not exhibit the classical features of melanoma and hence can be mistaken for a sarcomatous neoplasm when nuclear atypia is present or a benign soft tissue spindle cell tumor if the nuclear morphology is bland [5,8]. The presence of intracellular melanin pigment can be used as an important clue to the diagnosis which was present in approximately 80% of our cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although histologic examination of the surgical biopsies plays a major role in the diagnosis of primary cutaneous melanomas, FNAC is widely employed to confirm metastatic or recurrent lesions, with a sensitivity and specificity of 96.3% and 98.9%, respectively. [ 1 2 3 ] Despite the considerable current knowledge on the cytomorphology of melanoma, a cytologic diagnosis is often difficult, especially with amelanotic lesions. The hallmark cytomorphologic features include high cell - yield with a predominant population of dissociated cells with plasmacytoid, polygonal or spindle cells, nuclear pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli, intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions, and a variable number of bi- and multinucleated cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with image guidance is the frontrunner in the evaluation of masses in the most common metastatic sites of the human body such as liver, lung, and lymph nodes. [ 1 2 3 ] A stepwise approach to the diagnosis of metastases of unknown primary tumor employs a combination of clinical context, morphology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and molecular studies. [ 4 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Diagnosis of malignant melanoma, especially metastatic disease, is a common and cost-effective procedure. [6][7][8] In the study by Doubrovsky et al, 7 sensitivity in the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma was 92.1% and specificity was 99.2%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%