1989
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90878-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of left ventricular thrombi by magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with angiocardiography, computed tomography and echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differentiation between thrombus and slow-flowing blood on spin-echo MRI, however, may be difficult because of the increased MR signal produced by slow-flowing blood (Fig. 30) (Gomes et al 1987;Sechtem et al 1989). Brightblood MRI, in contrast, permits improved differentiation of thrombi from the surrounding blood pool and myocardium (Jungehulsing et al 1992).…”
Section: Thrombusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiation between thrombus and slow-flowing blood on spin-echo MRI, however, may be difficult because of the increased MR signal produced by slow-flowing blood (Fig. 30) (Gomes et al 1987;Sechtem et al 1989). Brightblood MRI, in contrast, permits improved differentiation of thrombi from the surrounding blood pool and myocardium (Jungehulsing et al 1992).…”
Section: Thrombusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac magnetic resonance has been shown to be substantially more sensitive than ECG at detecting previous silent MIs (32)(33)(34). CMR is also useful in assessing complications arising from acute MI including LV pseudoaneurysm (35), ventricular septal defect (36), mitral regurgitation (37), and ventricular thrombus (38,39).…”
Section: Structure and Tissue Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique is cumbersome and expensive; it is not commonly used clinically. CT and magnetic resonance imaging have limited application for detection of LVT because of availability, convenience, cost, and motion artifact limiting their sensitivity to detect small LVT [29]. Surprisingly, contrast left ventriculography is relatively insensitive and nonspecific for detecting LVT and has some potential to mechanically dislodge thrombus [30].…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%