2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(01)00165-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of HIV infection and laboratory monitoring of its therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This increased variability appeared in run 5, which contributed to the increased intervari- VOL. 47,2009 EVALUATING THE Abbott m2000 RealTime HIV-1 ASSAY 2211…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This increased variability appeared in run 5, which contributed to the increased intervari- VOL. 47,2009 EVALUATING THE Abbott m2000 RealTime HIV-1 ASSAY 2211…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In September 2007, approximately 329,000 individuals received antiretroviral (ARV) treatment as part of the national program (24a, 40). Globally, viral load (VL) testing has been used to monitor treatment, determine the prognosis and the risk of disease progression, and identify treatment failures (47). South African treatment guidelines use VL results to determine the time for the switch from a first-line to a second-line drug regimen (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qualitative and quantitative evaluation of both serum HIV-1 RNA genome and HIV-1 proviral DNA are pivotal markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of HIV-1 infection (7, 8). Although the quantitative determination of plasma HIV RNA copies directly represents viral replication and is the main prognostic parameter for disease progression (9), the HIV-1 proviral DNA load represents the infection reservoir in PBMC and lymphoid tissues and plays a pivotal role in immune surveillance escape (2, 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El HIV Ag/Ac está diseñado para detectar antígeno p24 así como anticuerpos contra HIV-1, HIV-1 grupo O y HIV-2 (28) . Diversas evaluaciones entre estos métodos demuestran ventas y desventajas símiles, siendo importante su valoración concernientes a interferentes, rendimiento diagnóstico y costo-efectividad (29,30,31) . La variación en el rendimiento de cada método puede deberse al tamaño de análisis y al flujo de pacientes seropositivos durante este tiempo dado que se utilizaron por separado (Tabla 1).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified