2009
DOI: 10.1159/000325378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of Follicular Neoplasm in Thyroid Nodules by Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of such an interpretation in our study is very low compared to that reported in the literature; however, there is a wide range of frequency of such an interpretation [31]. In their recent meta-analysis review about the BSRTC, Bongiovanni et al [29] reported that the range of this particular interpretation is 1.2-25.3% with a mean of 10.1%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The rate of such an interpretation in our study is very low compared to that reported in the literature; however, there is a wide range of frequency of such an interpretation [31]. In their recent meta-analysis review about the BSRTC, Bongiovanni et al [29] reported that the range of this particular interpretation is 1.2-25.3% with a mean of 10.1%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…However, there is wide variation in the reported malignancy rates for these categories. Typical reported malignancy rates in the literature for follicular neoplasm cytology range between 16 and 35% [10,11,12,13,14] and for AUS/FLUS cytology between 4.5 and 22.5% [10,11,12,15,16,17,18,19], but with malignancy rates as high as 27-48% reported by some authors [20,21,22,23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the same token, the category of follicular lesion/atypia of undetermined significance remains the most controversial category due to heterogeneity in its use among institutions and follow-up. This is due to the fact that it is nearly impossible to establish distinct morphologic criteria for diagnosing atypia among cytopathologists [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. It is has been shown that the best way to implement TBSRTC in a pathology laboratory and to convince the clinicians of its validity and robustness is to compare the outcome data prior to and after the implementation of TBSRTC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%