1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70090-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis in the neonatal period: A multicenter evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
42
3
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
42
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Maternofetal treatment had no clear influence on neonatal IgE detection. Naessens et al came to the same conclusion regarding IgM and IgA in a multicenter study (11). The diagnostic value of IgE detection at birth is slightly better than that of IgA but lower than that of IgM (respective specificities, 91.9, 88, and 96.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maternofetal treatment had no clear influence on neonatal IgE detection. Naessens et al came to the same conclusion regarding IgM and IgA in a multicenter study (11). The diagnostic value of IgE detection at birth is slightly better than that of IgA but lower than that of IgM (respective specificities, 91.9, 88, and 96.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Interestingly, IgE was found at birth in infants with congenital toxoplasmosis whose mothers had been infected during the first trimester of pregnancy, a situation in which maternal transmission to the fetus is thought to occur early. Given its generally short-lived nature, the presence of IgE at birth points to recent fetal synthesis resulting from late maternal transmission, or placental passage (during delivery) of long-lived maternal IgE (7,11). Maternofetal treatment had no clear influence on neonatal IgE detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Detection of a specific IgM antibody has limited the sensitivity in diagnosing other congenital infections, and it is possible that in utero production of an antibody is impaired such that congenitally infected infants might fail to produce a sufficient WNV-specific antibody to be detected with standard assays, particularly if they were infected early in pregnancy. [39][40][41][42] In such cases, and without the detection of viral RNA or antigen, the diagnosis of congenital WNV infection would need to be made based on clinical abnormalities, but without knowledge of the clinical spectrum of congenital WNV infection this is problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Lebech et al (14) documented that neonatal screening based on detection of specific IgM alone is able to diagnose more than 75% of infected infants who have not received antenatal therapy. Naessens et al (16) have found IgM antibody in neonatal blood in 85% of congenitally infected children born to untreated mothers but in only 25% of infants who were treated prenatally. Similarly, the sensitivities of diagnosing IgA in untreated and treated infants were 80 and 57%, respectively, although the impact of maternal-fetal treatment on the suppression of the newborn's immunological response has not been proven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%