1982
DOI: 10.1002/hed.2890040611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of carotid body tumors by dynamic computerized tomography

Abstract: The carotid body tumor, although uncommon, is frequently considered in the differential diagnosis of cervical masses. When this lesion becomes a serious diagnostic possibility, angiography must be considered. Currently angiography is the only nonsurgical modality that can reliably confirm the clinical diagnosis. We describe the case of a patient in whom a carotid body tumor was diagnosed preoperatively by dynamic computerized tomography. Dynamic computerized tomography, a relatively noninvasive technique, shou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was, however, not performed in all of the cases, mainly because we, as described by other authors, were sometimes thinking of other diagnoses such as lymphadenitis, lymphoma, hemangioma, schwannoma, etc. As a 2.25%, complication rate has been reported with contrast angiography by retrograde femoral approach, other diagnostic methods (safer and possibly as reliable) including radionuclide angiography and dynamic computed tomography have been proposed [13][14][15]. Other noninvasive techniques such as static gray-scale ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have also been proposed as eventually helpful in diagnosis [16,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was, however, not performed in all of the cases, mainly because we, as described by other authors, were sometimes thinking of other diagnoses such as lymphadenitis, lymphoma, hemangioma, schwannoma, etc. As a 2.25%, complication rate has been reported with contrast angiography by retrograde femoral approach, other diagnostic methods (safer and possibly as reliable) including radionuclide angiography and dynamic computed tomography have been proposed [13][14][15]. Other noninvasive techniques such as static gray-scale ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have also been proposed as eventually helpful in diagnosis [16,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiological evaluation includes angiography, computed tomography and MRI examination. High resolution CT with contrast medium injection shows bone destruction very well and the intracranial extension of the tumour (Duncan et al, 1979;Shugar and Mafee, 1982). MRI examination demonstrates the characteristic pattern of the 'salt and pepper' appearance on T 2 W, images described by Olsen et al (1987) for tumours more than 2 cm in diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%