2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2066-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis of acute fractures of the extremities: comparison of low-field MRI and conventional radiography

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare low-field MRI (0.2 T) and conventional radiography for the detection of acute fractures of the distal part of the extremities. X-ray and MRI examinations of 78 (41 fractures, 37 without fracture) patients with the clinical suspicion of an acute fracture in the distal part of the extremities were compared. Four experienced radiologists, two for each of the two modalities, independently analyzed the images. Interobserver variability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following abstract review, 89 articles were progressed to full-text review. A total of 23 articles were included for qualitative synthesis, of which 10 articles yielded data suitable for meta-analysis [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. These 10 articles examined an aggregate of 3902 sets of radiographs, producing a total of 4709 radiograph interpretation episodes for metaanalysis (see Fig.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following abstract review, 89 articles were progressed to full-text review. A total of 23 articles were included for qualitative synthesis, of which 10 articles yielded data suitable for meta-analysis [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. These 10 articles examined an aggregate of 3902 sets of radiographs, producing a total of 4709 radiograph interpretation episodes for metaanalysis (see Fig.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This included soft tissue injury, fractures, dislocations, osteomyelitis and osteoporosis. The other nine articles defined positive and negative finding as the presence or absence of a bony fracture [12,13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, two of these nine articles went further and required radiograph interpreters to correctly classify any fracture identified for their findings to be regarded as a 'true' positive.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation