The basic practice of ethnography has essentially remained unchanged in hundreds of years. How has online life changed things? I contrast two transformative inventions, the telephone and the internet, with respect to their impact on fieldwork. I argue that our current era has created entirely new constraints and opportunities for ethnographic research.
Keywords Digital ethnography • Qualitative methods • Online fieldwork • TelephoneOver the course of hundreds of years, the basic practice of what today we call ethnography has essentially remained unchanged. A scholar visits a site, observes its social interactions, interviews whoever will talk, and takes copious fieldnotes. This basic practice is essentially what friar de las Casas (2007 [1689]) did in his 1552 account of the indigenous populations in the Americas and the atrocities perpetrated by the Spanish conquerors; and it is essentially what sociology ethnographers did in the first decade of the 21st century when studying neighborhoods and organizations. Certainly, the practice has varied in scope, focus, theoretical orientation, and degree of self-critique; and ethnographers have surely explored many alternative objects of study, such as imagery and video. But in spite of major societal and economic transformations, deeply consequential changes in our means of communication, and multiple conceptual leaps in what researchers decide to observe, the basic expectation