2016
DOI: 10.5588/pha.16.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and treatment of TB patients with rifampicin resistance detected using Xpert® MTB/RIF in Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many countries still like to confirm their RR-TB Xpert results with conventional culture and drug sensitivity testing (CDST) in national reference laboratories, and this requires the transportation of sputum specimens from peripheral health facilities. Wherever this system has been assessed, it does not function 42 – 45 , and transportation is the major bottleneck. Other obstacles include the formation of committees to approve MDR-TB treatment and a battery of hematological and biochemical tests which are considered necessary in all settings before treatment can be started.…”
Section: Diagnose and Promptly Treat Drug-resistant Tuberculosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many countries still like to confirm their RR-TB Xpert results with conventional culture and drug sensitivity testing (CDST) in national reference laboratories, and this requires the transportation of sputum specimens from peripheral health facilities. Wherever this system has been assessed, it does not function 42 – 45 , and transportation is the major bottleneck. Other obstacles include the formation of committees to approve MDR-TB treatment and a battery of hematological and biochemical tests which are considered necessary in all settings before treatment can be started.…”
Section: Diagnose and Promptly Treat Drug-resistant Tuberculosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Zimbabwe, the submission rate of sputum samples for culture and DST at two healthcare centres was 70%, of which only half reached the laboratory and were processed. [34] Possible explanations for our results are that patients may have been transferred to the referral centre before a confirmatory specimen was submitted, the patient may no longer have been expectorating sputum, or the attending doctor may not have known the recommended protocol. Premature discharging of patients is a direct result of limited hospital beds and a high patient demand at our centre.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Possible explanations include a delay in obtaining a sputum sample from the patient, delays in transport, registration, or processing of the specimen by the laboratory, and sputum samples that may be lost in transit. [34] A contemporary investigation of the time to obtaining a result would be beneficial. After patients who were discharged or had died before their result became available were taken into account, 66% of the remaining 53 patients were isolated with a mean time of 4 days after being admitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with findings from a previous study in 2014 in two Zimbabwe provinces in which the proportion of specimens that reached the NRLs was 53%. 23 We do not know the precise reasons for this suboptimal performance, but they could include health care workers not adhering to policy guidelines that stipulate all sputum specimens for re-treatment TB patients be sent for CDST, a preference to just send specimens that are rifampicin resistant, unreliable sputum specimen transportation systems and poor administrative systems at the NRLs. Research, especially of a qualitative nature, is needed to find the answers to these questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%