2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70057-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
350
1
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(365 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
350
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the vast majority of telestroke studies relied on quasiexperimental designs, mostly by necessity, in 2012 a rare RCT, conducted in Germany, compared diagnosis and treatment of stroke patients in a mobile stroke unit versus in-hospital. 99 Randomization was by week, alternating between experimental and control groups, and was not masked from patients or investigators. The mobile units were equipped with a CT scanner, laboratory, and telemedicine equipment.…”
Section: The Search For Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the vast majority of telestroke studies relied on quasiexperimental designs, mostly by necessity, in 2012 a rare RCT, conducted in Germany, compared diagnosis and treatment of stroke patients in a mobile stroke unit versus in-hospital. 99 Randomization was by week, alternating between experimental and control groups, and was not masked from patients or investigators. The mobile units were equipped with a CT scanner, laboratory, and telemedicine equipment.…”
Section: The Search For Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…STEMO is set up to prove that this specific treatment can be safely administered in a prehospital setting and actually safes time compared to regular care 8,11 . First results from 12 prehospital thrombolyses in the Saarland State, Germany, seem promising in this respect 12 . In this study, Walter and colleagues reported that after randomized weeks between November, 2008, and July, 2011 and an interim analysis at 100 of 200 planned patients (53 in the prehospital setting, 47 in the control group), the median time from alarm to therapy decision (primary end-point) was substantially reduced in the 12 cases of prehospital thrombolysis: 35 min (IQR 31-39) versus 76 min, p<0.0001; median difference 41 min (95% CI 36-48 min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Walter et al 2010, Ebinger et al 2013 The concept has proven to be successful in randomized controlled trials (Walter et al 2012, Ebinger et al 2014) and it has deemed as highly cost-effective solution in a large metropolitan setting. However, the concept requires a large and high costs (Gyrd-Hansen et al 2015).…”
Section: Dispatch Time <1 Minutementioning
confidence: 99%