2008
DOI: 10.1002/0471142956.cya03cs43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and Treatment of Mycoplasma‐Contaminated Cell Cultures

Abstract: Mycoplasma contamination is a serious and frequent problem in the culture laboratory. Although mycoplasma contamination may be suspected by the failure of cells to thrive, the formal diagnosis rests on the detection of adenosine phosphorylase secretion by infected cell lines. This appendix describes how to test for mycoplasma contamination, and also presents methods for antibiotic treatment of infected cultures. Curr. Protocol. Cytom. 43:A.3C.1‐A.3C.7. © 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the frequency of misidentification and cross-contamination ( Nardone, 2007 ; Lacroix, 2008 ) it is essential that all cell lines are rigorously checked for their provenance and genetic identity ( Parodi et al , 2002 ; Yoshino et al , 2006 ). It is also important that cell lines are free from contamination with infectious agents such as mycoplasma, which can influence their biological behaviour and present a risk to handlers and animals ( Ishikawa et al , 2006 ; Sung et al , 2006 ; Harlin and Gajewski, 2008 ). Regardless of origin, detailed characterisation of tumours should be performed and checked periodically to ensure that desired properties are maintained and are commensurate with the molecular pathology of the corresponding human malignancy ( Santarius et al , 2010 ).…”
Section: Tumour Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the frequency of misidentification and cross-contamination ( Nardone, 2007 ; Lacroix, 2008 ) it is essential that all cell lines are rigorously checked for their provenance and genetic identity ( Parodi et al , 2002 ; Yoshino et al , 2006 ). It is also important that cell lines are free from contamination with infectious agents such as mycoplasma, which can influence their biological behaviour and present a risk to handlers and animals ( Ishikawa et al , 2006 ; Sung et al , 2006 ; Harlin and Gajewski, 2008 ). Regardless of origin, detailed characterisation of tumours should be performed and checked periodically to ensure that desired properties are maintained and are commensurate with the molecular pathology of the corresponding human malignancy ( Santarius et al , 2010 ).…”
Section: Tumour Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the representativity of the cancer cell line may be distorted by a cross contamination of one cell line by another (Ribeiro et al, 2008; Schweppe et al, 2008), an in vitro evolution of the cell line (van Staveren et al, 2009), a strong genomic instability due to the number of passages or a risk of infection (Harlin and Gajewski, 2008). Thus, a systematic verification of the status of these cell lines is important (van Staveren et al, 2007; Ribeiro et al, 2008; Schweppe et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common sources of mycoplasma contamination in the laboratory are infected cells sent from another lab and laboratory personnel infected with Mycoplasma orale or Mycoplasma fermentas . Thus, any strains received from another laboratory should be screened for the presence of mycoplasma ( APPENDIX here; Harlin and Gajewski, ). Should Mycoplasma be detected, the best practice is to discard the contaminated flask in order to reduce the spread of contamination.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%