2015
DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2014.3843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori for peptic ulcer bleeding in clinical practice - factors associated with non-diagnosis and non-treatment, and diagnostic yield in various settings

Abstract: Background/Aims: To study the practice of clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori for peptic ulcer bleeding, and the diagnostic yield of H. pylori tests in various situations. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients aged ≥18 years who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy for the indications of coffee-grounds vomitus, hematemesis or melena with endoscopically diagnosed peptic ulcers were included. Results: 374 patients were included. H. pylori testing was performed during acute bleeding f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, no recent meta-analyses or RCTs further examining either the diagnostic performance of testing in the acute setting or the concept of re-testing after the bleeding event, have been published. Re-testing for H. pylori is further supported only by the results of a 2014 prospective cohort study including 374 patients, in which retesting provided an additional diagnostic yield of 12.5 % (11 patients newly positive during delayed testing out of 88 initially negative patients, who repeated testing either through endoscopy or urea breath testing) [175]. Nevertheless, current evidence substantively justifies both the value of H. pylori testing in the acute setting as well as the role of delayed testing in minimizing the underestimation of H. pylori prevalence in peptic ulcer hemorrhage.…”
Section: Helicobacter Pylorimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, no recent meta-analyses or RCTs further examining either the diagnostic performance of testing in the acute setting or the concept of re-testing after the bleeding event, have been published. Re-testing for H. pylori is further supported only by the results of a 2014 prospective cohort study including 374 patients, in which retesting provided an additional diagnostic yield of 12.5 % (11 patients newly positive during delayed testing out of 88 initially negative patients, who repeated testing either through endoscopy or urea breath testing) [175]. Nevertheless, current evidence substantively justifies both the value of H. pylori testing in the acute setting as well as the role of delayed testing in minimizing the underestimation of H. pylori prevalence in peptic ulcer hemorrhage.…”
Section: Helicobacter Pylorimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requirement is based on the supposition that the existence of these bacteria is linked to ulcers or cancers of the excluded stomach after the procedure. The present study uses a number of tests to conclude its diagnosis, including the rapid urease test, histology and tissue biopsy, along with non-endoscopic tests of blood and serum 10 , 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During Oesophagio-Gastro-Duodenoscopy (OGD), there are three methods to identify the organism in a gastric biopsy specimen: rapid urease test, histology, and culture. The choice of method depends on the clinical situation, cost, and test accuracy [14]. In general, in each case, 1 or 2 biopsies should be obtained from both the antrum and corpus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, in each case, 1 or 2 biopsies should be obtained from both the antrum and corpus. Guidelines propose initially using the rapid urease test because the method is efficient, relatively inexpensive, and generally accurate [14][15]. Test results are often positive within minutes to hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation