2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: Guidelines of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
108
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the guidelines for the management of DIC in other countries, the Japanese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis recommends the use of antithrombin for DIC treatment and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare permits the use of antithrombin as a DIC treatment drug [31][32][33]. The JAAM DIC Study Group was apprehensive about the decision of the ethics committees of the participating hospitals; therefore, the use of gabexate mesilate was permitted when the ethics committees required some interventions for the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the guidelines for the management of DIC in other countries, the Japanese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis recommends the use of antithrombin for DIC treatment and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare permits the use of antithrombin as a DIC treatment drug [31][32][33]. The JAAM DIC Study Group was apprehensive about the decision of the ethics committees of the participating hospitals; therefore, the use of gabexate mesilate was permitted when the ethics committees required some interventions for the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Similar scoring systems and diagnostic guidance have been developed and extensively evaluated in Japan, Italy and the United Kingdom. [47][48][49] The major difference between the international and Japanese scoring systems seems a slightly higher sensitivity of the Japanese algorithm, although this may be due to different patient populations as Japanese series typically include relatively large numbers of patients with haematological malignancies. In our patient the platelet count (1 point), prolongation of the PT (1 point) and strongly increased D-dimer (3 points) leads to a score of 5 points, compatible with a diagnosis of DIC.…”
Section: Comments About Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Italian or Japanese clinical practice guidelines for DIC treatment have recommended the use of rhs-TM, while British clinical practice guidelines have not mentioned the use of rhs-TM. [23][24][25][26] In addition, developing nations tend to have lower diffusion speeds and lower maximum penetration levels of new drugs than do developed countries. 27 Therefore, further investigation of the use of rhs-TM in other countries is vital to confirm the impact of the increasing use of rhs-TM in patients with infectious disease-associated DIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%