Diagnosis and referral delays in primary care for oral squamous cell cancer: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundThe incidence of oral cancer is increasing. Guidance for oral cancer from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is unique in recommending cross-primary care referral from GPs to dentists.AimThis review investigates knowledge about delays in the diagnosis of symptomatic oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in primary care.Design and settingAn independent multi-investigator literature search strategy and an analysis of study methodologies using a modified data extraction tool based on Aarhus checklist criteria relevant to primary care.MethodThe authors conducted a focused systematic review involving document retrieval from five databases up to March 2018. Included were studies looking at OSCC diagnosis from when patients first accessed primary care up to referral, including length of delay and stage of disease at time of definitive diagnosis.ResultsFrom 538 records, 16 articles were eligible for full-text review. In the UK, more than 55% of patients with OSCC were referred by their GP, and 44% by their dentist. Rates of prescribing between dentists and GPs were similar, and both had similar delays in referral, though one study found greater delays attributed to dentists as they had undertaken dental procedures. On average, patients had two to three consultations before referral. Less than 50% of studies described the primary care aspect of referral in detail. There was no information on inter-GP–dentist referrals.ConclusionThere is a need for primary care studies on OSCC diagnosis. There was no evidence that GPs performed less well than dentists, which calls into question the NICE cancer option to refer to dentists, particularly in the absence of robust auditable pathways.

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of general medical practitioners in developed countries regarding oral cancer: an integrative review

“…However, these guidelines have been challenged by researchers due to the lack of accessible and affordable dental referral pathways for patients ( 80–82 ) in the UK, which could lead to further delays in diagnosis. Further, a recent systematic review of patient journeys in the diagnosis of oral cancer found no evidence to suggest that GPs performed less well than dentists in terms of referrals to specialists ( 81 ). Our findings along with previous research ( 75 , 81 ) suggest the need to also design and include a standard referral pathway globally for definitive care and management of oral cancer to reduce any further delays in initializing the treatment.…”

Identification of Novel MicroRNAs and Their Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance in Oral Cancer

“…Despite that the oral cavity is readily explorable, most oral tumors are diagnosed at an advanced stage reducing the survival rate of patients [19,20]. Currently, there are no effective biomarkers for the early diagnosis of oral cancer.…”

People would rather see a physician than a dentist when experiencing a long-standing oral ulceration. A population-based study in Spain

“…Primary care physicians consistently are the first choice for patients with oral ulcerations both in our study and in the literature ( 7 ), only behind traditional remedies in certain countries, which have been proved to increase the risk for presenting with advanced disease stage at diagnosis ( 19 ). Studies on cancer patients confirm the preference for physicians ( 20 ), with the only exception of Japan, where dentists are reported to be the clinician of choice ( 21 ).…”