2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02302.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosis and quantification of bone marrow fibrosis are significantly biased by the pre‐staining processing of bone marrow biopsies

Abstract: Evaluations of MF and its prognostic significance should consider the bias due to the prestaining processing of BMBs and the necessity of an adjustment to the thickness of tissue sections and the degree of marrow tissue shrinkage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the strong dependence of the diagnosis of MF on the technical preparation of BMBs 39 and on the approach used to prove MF, 23 the diversity in the reported frequencies appears to reflect technical problems or problems of selection rather than a biological difference. Founding the evaluations on patients whose bone marrow had been planned up-front to be both aspirated and biopsied for initial diagnosis of an unclear cytopenia, it is unlikely that full-blown MF affects more than 30% of patients with primary MDS, an observation which is in agreement with earlier results from other authors.…”
Section: Mds With Mfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the strong dependence of the diagnosis of MF on the technical preparation of BMBs 39 and on the approach used to prove MF, 23 the diversity in the reported frequencies appears to reflect technical problems or problems of selection rather than a biological difference. Founding the evaluations on patients whose bone marrow had been planned up-front to be both aspirated and biopsied for initial diagnosis of an unclear cytopenia, it is unlikely that full-blown MF affects more than 30% of patients with primary MDS, an observation which is in agreement with earlier results from other authors.…”
Section: Mds With Mfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 According to our observations, this method appears to be superior to all other currently known approaches to prove and quantify MF considering sensitivity, specificity, precision, reproducibility, prognostic relevance of results 9 and adjustability to influences from technical processing of BMBs. 29 A ratio V MF o0.05 is equivalent to the fiber content in normal healthy marrow. A ratio between 0.05 and 0.15 indicates FFI, and a ratio V MF 40.15 corresponds to MF in semiquantitative grading.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Marrow Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and those derived histologically for the pig calcaneus seem negligible and may be the result of histological preparation rather than the potential inaccuracies of our automated technique. This discrepancy could probably have been reduced, or even eliminated, if the tissue had not been decalcified (Buesche et al, 2006). Hence, while the discrepancies can be explained and do not invalidate the program presented here, more fundamental issues are raised by the present findings, especially when histological sections are used as the gold standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%