2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0099348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing the pedestal magnetic field and magnetohydrodynamics radial structure with pedestal–scrape of layer electron cyclotron emission radiation inversion in H-mode plasma (invited)

Abstract: Forward modeling is used to interpret inversion patterns of the pedestal–Scrape of Layer (SOL) Electron Cyclotron Emission (ECE) in DIII-D H-mode experiments. The modeling not only significantly improves the ECE data interpretation quality but also leads to the potential measurements of (1) the magnetic field strength |B| at the separatrix, (2) the pedestal |B| evolution during an inter-Edge Localized Mode (ELM) period, and (3) the pedestal Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) radial structure. The ECE shine-through eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, if , called the optical thin area, the electron temperature can no longer be easily interpreted by the unless the optical thickness can be predicted in advance. Therefore, the optical thickness is crucial for data interpretation, especially at the edge of a tokamak where the optical thickness is normally thin [22][23][24]. In such cases, synthetic diagnostic using forward modeling can assist in interpreting experimental data even under these non-ideal conditions.…”
Section: I(ω)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, if , called the optical thin area, the electron temperature can no longer be easily interpreted by the unless the optical thickness can be predicted in advance. Therefore, the optical thickness is crucial for data interpretation, especially at the edge of a tokamak where the optical thickness is normally thin [22][23][24]. In such cases, synthetic diagnostic using forward modeling can assist in interpreting experimental data even under these non-ideal conditions.…”
Section: I(ω)mentioning
confidence: 99%