2019
DOI: 10.1175/jpo-d-18-0103.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing the Influence of Mesoscale Eddy Fluxes on the Deep Western Boundary Current in the 1/10° STORM/NCEP Simulation

Abstract: Using a 0.1° ocean model, this paper establishes a consistent picture of the interaction of mesoscale eddy density fluxes with the geostrophic deep western boundary current (DWBC) in the Atlantic between 26°N and 20°S. Above the DWBC core (the level of maximum southward flow, ~2000-m depth), the eddies flatten isopycnals and hence decrease the potential energy of the mean flow, which agrees with their interpretation and parameterization in the Gent–McWilliams framework. Below the core, even though the eddy flu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in the CMCC‐CM2‐(V)HR4 it reaches to nearly 5,000 m, with the other models falling in between these ranges. In the LR models the DWBC has a much less well‐defined core, perhaps partly due to the Gent and McWilliams (1990) scheme flattening the isopycnals (Lüschow et al, 2019). The depth of the return flows indicated by these profiles is consistent with the differences between the models seen in Figure 1, in which models with the densest deep water have also a larger return flow at greater depths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in the CMCC‐CM2‐(V)HR4 it reaches to nearly 5,000 m, with the other models falling in between these ranges. In the LR models the DWBC has a much less well‐defined core, perhaps partly due to the Gent and McWilliams (1990) scheme flattening the isopycnals (Lüschow et al, 2019). The depth of the return flows indicated by these profiles is consistent with the differences between the models seen in Figure 1, in which models with the densest deep water have also a larger return flow at greater depths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tracer‐based velocity estimates are about one order of magnitude lower than current‐meter measurements of the DWBC speed (Lee et al., 1996; Rhein et al., 2015). Observations (Kanzow et al., 2008; Lee et al., 1996) and models (Lüschow et al., 2019) suggest that the deep flow is subject to strong temporal variability associated with meanders of the DWBC and eddies. Leaman and Vertes (1996) find eddies triggered by the marked topography of San Salvador (∼24°N) to reduce the mean southward velocity of RAFOS floats compared with their speed within the DWBC itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eliminating w between Eq. (3) and the time averaged density budget, which has been found to be reasonably approximated by u Á =r ' 2= Á u 0 r 0 near the DWBC (Lüschow et al 2019), yields the along-stream averaged potential vorticity equation…”
Section: B Eddy Thickness Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STORM configuration with its tripolar grid has two coordinate poles in the Northern Hemisphere over Asia and North America, ensuring an essentially uniform resolution. STORM's ability to represent large parts of the mesoscale eddy field was demonstrated for mesoscale eddies in general (e.g., von Storch et al 2012;von Storch et al 2016) and also for deep eddies in particular (Lüschow et al 2019). The GR15 configuration uses a bipolar grid with a resolution of about 180 km in our region of interest at low latitudes, rendering it mostly free of eddies.…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation