2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing the creativity of designers: individual feedback within mass higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The charter does not address creativity specifically and studies on design education (Rufinoni 2002) show the lack of application of pedagogical instruments to develop critical consciousness and ethical attitudes in students. Jeffries (2007) as well reaffirms the need for new teaching methods in the design-studio to increase creative thought.…”
Section: The Creative Processmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The charter does not address creativity specifically and studies on design education (Rufinoni 2002) show the lack of application of pedagogical instruments to develop critical consciousness and ethical attitudes in students. Jeffries (2007) as well reaffirms the need for new teaching methods in the design-studio to increase creative thought.…”
Section: The Creative Processmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The traditional studio model is, due to its nature and structure, an expensive and resourceintensive endeavor relative to other modes of education (Jeffries, 2007). As tools become more sophisticated and costly, while also proliferating in variety and sheer number, providing the physical tools and the technical knowledge to support such resources is likely to continue as a major challenge.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAT is a well-established technique to appraise creativity in art and design tasks and was utilized in several studies previously (Jeffries 2007;Meneely and Portillo 2005;Christiaans 2002). In line with CAT, the judges were instructed to rate the creativity and the technical quality of the students' works relative to one another and to work independently.…”
Section: Design and Drafting Performancementioning
confidence: 99%