2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing Students’ conception on atomic structure using open ended questions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most surprising results for us has been to find that, both in Group 1, and in Group objectives, the textbook they use, the type of teaching resources applied, etc (Quesada, Valcárcel and Sánchez, 2005;Domenech, Savall and Martínez-Torregrosa, 2013;Fitriza and Gazali, 2018). These variables were not analysed in this work and will constitute a line of future research that could be of great educational interest.…”
Section: Discussion and Educational Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most surprising results for us has been to find that, both in Group 1, and in Group objectives, the textbook they use, the type of teaching resources applied, etc (Quesada, Valcárcel and Sánchez, 2005;Domenech, Savall and Martínez-Torregrosa, 2013;Fitriza and Gazali, 2018). These variables were not analysed in this work and will constitute a line of future research that could be of great educational interest.…”
Section: Discussion and Educational Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As Justi and Gilbert (2002) explain, the evolution of a mental model is somewhat slow and hard and needs an assimilation time that will be longer or shorter depending on the times that the model has been tested and evaluated. At the same time, it must be taking account that to build a correct atomic model, the students should have abstract and spatial knowledge which is more difficult to achieve in young people than for adults (Talanquer, 2009;Fitriza and Gazali, 2018). On the other hand, it has been found that teachers offer to students few situations to check their mental models, so they are not able to assess their atom´s model and thus, it takes so much time to find the strengths and weaknesses of their models (Justi and Gilbert, 2002;Park and Light, 2009).…”
Section: Discussion and Educational Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Curriculum decisions: the moment when the contents appears in the curriculum or an overemphasis on classical physics, leaving little space for learning quantum concepts Pedagogical practices, learning material, and textbooks The formation of misconceptions about atoms by students (a set of misconceptions identified in the literature are included in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Students’ Difficulties Regarding the Atom Concept And The Qu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, students have difficulty to visualize atomic structure and models due to the relationship between multiple representations [10]. Furthermore, they have many misconceptions about these abstract concepts such as atom models, protons, neutrons, electrons, ions and models have been identified in the literature [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Some of misconceptions are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.…”
Section: Multiple Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%