1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1993.tb05354.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing multiple sclerosis in childhood

Abstract: By presenting the cases of 3 children with laboratory supported definite multiple sclerosis [LSDMS] according to Poser's diagnostic criteria, we illustrate the difficulties of diagnosing MS in childhood. In search for appropriate diagnostic criteria for childhood MS, the literature on childhood MS is reviewed, and the 3 cases presented are compared with the 15 hitherto reported with the diagnosis LSDMS. Specific difficulties of diagnosing MS in childhood are discussed. They include history taking in children, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22 Among diagnostic tests, brain MRI was confirmed as the most sensitive test, showing white matter lesions in all patients with the pattern of lesions strongly suggestive/ suggestive of MS. 13 The demonstration of oligoclonal bands was also frequent in our (87.2%) as well as in other reports. 4,8,[23][24][25][26] Evoked potentials can also substantiate the diagnosis, showing asymptomatic lesions in several cases: in our series the frequency of subclinical lesions ranged from 40%, for brainstem auditory evoked potentials, to 68.3%, for visual evoked potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…21,22 Among diagnostic tests, brain MRI was confirmed as the most sensitive test, showing white matter lesions in all patients with the pattern of lesions strongly suggestive/ suggestive of MS. 13 The demonstration of oligoclonal bands was also frequent in our (87.2%) as well as in other reports. 4,8,[23][24][25][26] Evoked potentials can also substantiate the diagnosis, showing asymptomatic lesions in several cases: in our series the frequency of subclinical lesions ranged from 40%, for brainstem auditory evoked potentials, to 68.3%, for visual evoked potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…9 The literature on EOMS is largely based on small groups of patients or on individual case reports. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Study groups of over 100 patients are rare. 1,4 Information about the natural history of EOMS is not uniform.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%