2006
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2006.tb07569.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing corrosion problems through differentiation of metal fractions

Abstract: This article hypothesizes how uniform and pitting corrosion are expressed in the dissolved and particulate metals concentrations of water samples. Three case studies highlight examples of how a metals differentiation technique was used in corrosion investigations. The technique offers insight into the nature and sometimes the cause of the corrosion, leading to selection of control strategies not necessarily suggested in standard corrosion reference books or the federal corrosion regulations. Additional researc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Madison, Wis., the utility and homeowners worked together for several years to fully replace the lead service lines in every home in their service area (Corley 2016). High lead levels were found in a number of samples four years after all of the lead pipes were replaced in Madison, Wis. (Cantor 2006), suggesting that even after all the lead pipes are replaced, it may take years for the lead levels in Flint to reach a point at which the concentrations of all samples are below the action level. Clearly there is much to be done before the water crisis in Flint is over.…”
Section: So What Went Wrong In Flint?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Madison, Wis., the utility and homeowners worked together for several years to fully replace the lead service lines in every home in their service area (Corley 2016). High lead levels were found in a number of samples four years after all of the lead pipes were replaced in Madison, Wis. (Cantor 2006), suggesting that even after all the lead pipes are replaced, it may take years for the lead levels in Flint to reach a point at which the concentrations of all samples are below the action level. Clearly there is much to be done before the water crisis in Flint is over.…”
Section: So What Went Wrong In Flint?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, it was surprising that elevated lead could persist for so long after full LSL removal. The erratic lead concentrations were attributed to particulate (and not dissolved) lead in water, suggesting that particulate matter had accumulated in the premise plumbing and was dislodging into the water even after LSL replacement (Cantor, 2006a, 2004).…”
Section: Madison's Lcr Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lead consumption can pose severe health risk to the public by impairing human nervous, digestive, hematopoietic, cardiovascular, and urinary systems. , Before 1986, lead pipes were used as service lines for water supply to connect buildings to water mains . Lead can be released into drinking water from lead pipes and scales of lead-containing corrosion products on the pipes, lead-bearing brass, copper/lead solder joints, and galvanized iron pipes. For lead corrosion control, an action level of 15 μg/L was set by the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) for the total lead concentration in water systems serving more than 50 000 people…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%