2004
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.158.6.584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing Celiac Disease

Abstract: The presence of human anti-tTG is a reliable indicator for the diagnosis and follow-up of CD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is in accordance with previous studies showing that AGA-IgA should no longer be performed because of a lack of specificity or a lack of sensitivity when compared with tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA (11,15,22,23). Another study gave the same results, showing that all of the AGA-IgA-positive results in the presence of negative tTG/EMA were false-positives (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our study is in accordance with previous studies showing that AGA-IgA should no longer be performed because of a lack of specificity or a lack of sensitivity when compared with tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA (11,15,22,23). Another study gave the same results, showing that all of the AGA-IgA-positive results in the presence of negative tTG/EMA were false-positives (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The anti-tTG assay emerged as a great hope for celiac disease screening, since it is an easily-executed test with a relatively low cost and can be used in screening studies, with similar results to those obtained using AEA, which is considered the best serological test for this disease (14,(16)(17)(18) . The AEA takes longer, costs more and is operator-dependent, which can lead to errors (14,17,19,20) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Over recent years, attempts have been made to find other diagnostic methods with good sensitivity and specificity for the screening and diagnosis of celiac patients .The anti-tTG assay emerged as a great hope for celiac disease screening, since it is an easily-executed test with a relatively low cost and can be used in screening studies (7)(8)(9) . The AEA takes longer, costs more and is operator-dependent, which can lead to errors (8,(10)(11)(12) . Based on the available evidence and on practical considerations, anti-tTG is the primary test recommended for screening (8,11) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%