2007
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.113001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing abuse: a systematic review of torn frenum and other intra-oral injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
75
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither injuries reported by negligence or sexual abuse nor racial characteristics and socio-economic context of the abused children were analysed or described. Two systematic reviews were included [20,21]. Seventy one clinical cases were reported in twenty six papers; thirty five met the inclusion criteria having thirty six been excluded .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Neither injuries reported by negligence or sexual abuse nor racial characteristics and socio-economic context of the abused children were analysed or described. Two systematic reviews were included [20,21]. Seventy one clinical cases were reported in twenty six papers; thirty five met the inclusion criteria having thirty six been excluded .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoral lesions occur in a significant number of abused children, being widely distributed (lips, mucosa, tongue and palate) [21]. Frenulum laceration is mainly described in children of preschool age target of grievous abuse [21]. As the literature mentions accidental frenulum laceration a laceration isolated cannot be described as pathognomonic of child maltreatment [21].…”
Section: Systematic Reviews Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The graphic shows two brushes, overloaded with copious amounts of paste, a not uncommon finding in illustrations and photographs used in health education material aimed at young children and their parents. Since the early 1990s 1 it has been agreed that the amount of toothpaste used by children should be restricted letters to a smear (under three years) or peasize amount (3-6-years-old) -a message endorsed on tubes of fluoride containing toothpaste sold in the UK and recognised in national 2,3 and international 4 clinical guidelines. Whilst recognising the freedom that abstract art enjoys and the professional nature of the intended audience on this occasion, your cover provides an opportune reminder to those involved in producing health education material, of the importance of reinforcing in pictures and graphics, the message about appropriate dispensing of toothpaste for young children.…”
Section: Four Handed Wisdommentioning
confidence: 99%