2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnoses and Treatment in Juvenile Detention Before and After Evaluation by Facility-Based Mental Health Service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Justice-involved youth exhibit markedly high rates of mental health problems (e.g., Casiano et al, 2013; Whitney et al, 2022). One thus-far underexplored factor that may contribute to these problems is exposure to PMIEs (Litz et al, 2009), for which these youth appear to be at risk from multiple sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Justice-involved youth exhibit markedly high rates of mental health problems (e.g., Casiano et al, 2013; Whitney et al, 2022). One thus-far underexplored factor that may contribute to these problems is exposure to PMIEs (Litz et al, 2009), for which these youth appear to be at risk from multiple sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows that two-thirds of these youth meet the criteria for at least one serious psychiatric disorder, underscoring the extreme mental health burden borne by this population (e.g., Teplin et al, 2002; see Colins et al, 2010 for a review). Primary among these disorders are frequently overlooked internalizing problems, including depression, anxiety, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), as well as posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS; Casiano et al, 2013; Teplin et al, 2002; Whitney et al, 2022). These symptoms are undoubtedly highly deleterious to youths’ well-being and create a significant need for mental health and rehabilitative services for detained youth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in children in juvenile detention, the prevalence was reported as 13.7% of children in the community (prior to detention), however once they were re-evaluated within the juvenile detention centre this dropped dramatically to 0.9%. 14 The immense variation in statistics within a recent sampling frame highlights the poor inter-rater reliability of the diagnosis and taken together these studies illustrate that researchers utilise a variety of criteria and differing methods and often sample quite disparate populations. This necessarily makes any effort to draw meaningful correlations and amalgamate findings extremely difficult.…”
Section: The Prevailing Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, another complication that is less obvious is that results can change even within the same cohort and are subject to who conducts the assessment. For example, in children in juvenile detention, the prevalence was reported as 13.7% of children in the community (prior to detention), however once they were re‐evaluated within the juvenile detention centre this dropped dramatically to 0.9% 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%