2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagenetic patterns and pore space distribution along a platform to outer-shelf transect (Urgonian limestone, Barremian–Aptian, SE France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scenarios of diagenetic and pore network evolution of the Urgonian limestones from Provence have been proposed by Léonide et al (2014) and Fournier et al (2014). According to these interpretations, highly microporous limestones are considered to have developed as a result of micrite leaching and neomorphism in a meteoric shallow-burial setting probably during a.…”
Section: Lower Cretaceous (Barremian-aptian) Shallow-water Marine Carmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scenarios of diagenetic and pore network evolution of the Urgonian limestones from Provence have been proposed by Léonide et al (2014) and Fournier et al (2014). According to these interpretations, highly microporous limestones are considered to have developed as a result of micrite leaching and neomorphism in a meteoric shallow-burial setting probably during a.…”
Section: Lower Cretaceous (Barremian-aptian) Shallow-water Marine Carmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The Urgonian facies rocks are very tight, with a very low intergranular porosity (Leonide et al, 2014), and with mainly porosity and permeability in karstified vertical faults and fractures. These fractures have been recognized across the carbonate Jurassic and Cretaceous rocks.…”
Section: How Has Geological Evolution Structured the Aquifer?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, a complex interplay of (often facies‐related) diagenetic processes affected the bulk carbonate carbon‐isotope archive of the Sausset and Martigues sections, thereby masking the initial δ 13 C DIC pattern and lowering its potential for regional and global correlation purposes. Judging from stable isotope, microfacies, and cathodoluminescence data obtained during the current study and previous work [ Lamarche et al ., ; Léonide et al ., ], differential diagenetic alteration along stratigraphic and spatial transects was controlled by (i) the distance to the shoreline (Sausset ≪ Martigues), (ii) burial depth (Sausset: 600 m; Martigues: 800 m), and (iii) microporosity (Sausset: tight carbonates; Martigues: porous and tight carbonates).…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in porosity at Sausset and Martigues also add to the differential spatial (and stratigraphic) diagenetic alteration of bulk carbonate carbon‐isotope archives. Whereas carbonates exposed at the Sausset section provide neither macro nor microporosity, the Martigues section is characterized by an alternation of tight and (micro)porous carbonates [ Lamarche et al ., ; Léonide et al ., ]. According to Léonide et al .…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation