2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagenetic differences caused by the charging of natural gases with various compositions - a case study on the lower Zhuhai Formation clastic reservoirs in the WC-A sag, the Pearl River Mouth Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the wells of the C24 block at the same depth, the main detrital grain contact is line contact and partly point‐line contact (Figures 5 and 7). The transformation from point contact to line contact suggests for an increasing sandstone compaction (Duan et al, 2017; Stricker & Jones, 2016). The C24 block showed significantly higher compaction intensity of sandstone than the S13 block (Table 5 and Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the wells of the C24 block at the same depth, the main detrital grain contact is line contact and partly point‐line contact (Figures 5 and 7). The transformation from point contact to line contact suggests for an increasing sandstone compaction (Duan et al, 2017; Stricker & Jones, 2016). The C24 block showed significantly higher compaction intensity of sandstone than the S13 block (Table 5 and Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the abundant raw materials from dissolution can facilitate the late‐stage production of siderite, ferrocalcite, ankerite, and authigenic clays, and can influence clay transformation (Duan et al, 2020; Fu et al, 2016; Jiang, Xie, Chen, Wang, & Li, 2015). At wells S13A, S13B, and S13C, in contrast, the late‐stage dissolution produced massive CO 3 2− , Ca 2+ , and Fe 2+ ions, and facilitated the late‐stage formation of siderite (Duan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation