2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12583-020-1289-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagenetic and Reservoir Quality Variation of Miocene Sandstone Reservoir Analogues from Three Basins of Southern California, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar with conventional reservoirs (e.g., sandstone and carbonates rocks), porosity and permeability are two key parameters that control reservoir quality in shale rocks, which are primarily controlled by the shale composition and diagenetic processes. For example, a large volume of primary pores was lost during the compaction, while abundant tiny OM pores could be generated during the kerogen thermal maturation and hydrocarbon expulsion. ,,, Table shows that the examined samples have similar thermal maturity levels; thus thermal maturity is not the main factor to the variations in pore structure between samples. Mineral composition results show that the samples from Ek 2 have various contents of analcite minerals (average 33%) among different shale lithofacies, which is quite different compared to the widely reported marine and transitional shales (e.g., Longmaxi Shale, Niutitang Shale, and Longtan-Dalong Shales). ,, Thus, the effect of analcite mineral on pore development and preservation could be of importance for the evaluation of reservoir quality evaluation, which was mainly discussed in this work.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar with conventional reservoirs (e.g., sandstone and carbonates rocks), porosity and permeability are two key parameters that control reservoir quality in shale rocks, which are primarily controlled by the shale composition and diagenetic processes. For example, a large volume of primary pores was lost during the compaction, while abundant tiny OM pores could be generated during the kerogen thermal maturation and hydrocarbon expulsion. ,,, Table shows that the examined samples have similar thermal maturity levels; thus thermal maturity is not the main factor to the variations in pore structure between samples. Mineral composition results show that the samples from Ek 2 have various contents of analcite minerals (average 33%) among different shale lithofacies, which is quite different compared to the widely reported marine and transitional shales (e.g., Longmaxi Shale, Niutitang Shale, and Longtan-Dalong Shales). ,, Thus, the effect of analcite mineral on pore development and preservation could be of importance for the evaluation of reservoir quality evaluation, which was mainly discussed in this work.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Eodiagenesis of these sandstones is evident by the presence of isolated to pointed‐grain boundaries. These diagenetic fabrics are interpreted to have formed at very shallow burial depths due to light to moderate overlying sediment loads (Okunuwadje, Macdonald, et al, 2020), and may be associated with sediment dewatering, grain adjustment, grain packing and densification (Bjørlykke & Jahren, 2010; Rahman & Worden, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These diagenetic fabrics are developed by intense mechanical compaction following increased sediment load and vertical stress, squeezing grains together and reducing inter‐grain pore spaces. These diagenetic features have been linked to mesodiagenesis (Figure 14a), which typically occurs at depths exceeding 2 km (Bjørlykke & Jahren, 2010; Morad et al, 2000; Okunuwadje, 2019; Okunuwadje, Bowden, et al, 2020; Okunuwadje, Macdonald, et al, 2020; Oluwadebi et al, 2018; Schmidt & McDonald, 1984; Worden & Burley, 2003; Zeng, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations