2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.endoen.2013.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DiabeTIC website: A pilot study of satisfaction and impact on metabolic control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 7 out of 32 participants were women diagnosed with GDM. The overall mean score from study participants on the item “the platform is easy to use” was 8.1 (SD 1.5, range 5-10) [ 30 , 48 ]. Rasekaba et al [ 50 ] identified in their study that barriers to using the app were due to the women’s level of digital literacy and technology proficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 7 out of 32 participants were women diagnosed with GDM. The overall mean score from study participants on the item “the platform is easy to use” was 8.1 (SD 1.5, range 5-10) [ 30 , 48 ]. Rasekaba et al [ 50 ] identified in their study that barriers to using the app were due to the women’s level of digital literacy and technology proficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A satisfaction survey conducted on the DiabeTIC web-based telemedicine platform found that the women's mean score on the item "understanding how to navigate through the platform" was 6.7 (SD 3.0, range 1-10), and the mean score on the item "adequate visualization of all information" was 8.2 (SD 1.8, range 4-10) [30,48]. Mackillop et al [49] tested the usability and reliability of the app and, following the results, app displays and colors were changed.…”
Section: Display and Organization-simple Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online supplemental tables 1–3 summarize the characteristics of the included studies . Of the 92 studies included, 98 different intervention groups were isolated: 17 NC, 3244,46,47,55,65 46 MNF, 45,48,64,66–74,7690,137 and 35 NNI. 75,91,93…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online supplemental tables 1-3 summarize the characteristics of the included studies. Of the 92 studies included, 98 different intervention groups were isolated: 17 NC, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]46,47,55,65 46 MNF, 45,48,64,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90]137 and 35 NNI. 75,91, Within the NC subgroup there were 11 randomized clinical trials, 5 pre/post intervention studies, and 1 cohort.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la primera búsqueda fueron identificados 91 artículos y documentos, de éstos fueron seleccionados 63 para revisar el resumen, fueron descartados 10 artículos duplicados y dos no fueron recuperados. Finalmente fueron incluídas un total de 51 artículos y documentos distribuidos así: Pubmed: 31 [173]…”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified