Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures

Pérez-Panero, Alberto J.; Ruiz-Muñoz, María; Fernández-Torres, Raúl; Formosa, Cynthia; Gatt, Alfred; Gónzalez-Sánchez, Manuel

doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02892-4

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is one questionnaire similar enough to DFSQ-UMA in the scientific literature, i.e., the Diabetes Foot-Self Care Behavior Scale (DFSBS) ( 32 ), which is a 7-item questionnaire with good psychometric properties available in the Chinese, Farsi and German languages ( 33 , 34 ). However, a recent systematic review on PROMs in DFD patients recommends DFSQ-UMA over DFSBS, as the former meets the current recommendations to a greater extent compared to the latter ( 7 , 35 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Recent systematic reviews have concluded that PROMs lack availability and psychometric quality for patients with DFD. The Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire (DFSQ-UMA) was identified as the best option for assessing foot self-care (7)(8)(9). The evaluation of self-care is essential in chronic diseases, since higher levels of self-care have been associated with better health outcomes, including decreased hospitalization, costs, and mortality (10).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation

Ruiz-Muñoz,

Fernández-Torres,

Formosa

et al. 2024

Front. Public Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to carry out the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire into the English language, broadening the applicability of this patient-reported outcome measure and improving the monitoring of patients with diabetic foot disease.MethodsThe validation study into English was conducted in two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation study. Short Form-12 Version 2, EuroQoL-5D and Foot Function Index were used to analyze the criterion validity. Item response, internal consistency, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change and construct validity were calculated in the validation phase.ResultsAn English version of the questionnaire (DFSQ-UMA-En) was successfully obtained. A total of n = 193 participants were tested to confirm the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. Internal consistency values ranged from very good to excellent (Cronbach’s α =0.889–0.981), and reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.854–0.959). Standard error measurement value was =2.543. Criterion validity ranged from r = 0.429 to r = 0.844. For construct validity, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test was =0.752.ConclusionDFSQ-UMA-En is a valid and reliable tool with good readability and comprehension features. This questionnaire addresses foot self-care behaviors in patients with diabetic foot disease, standing out as essential for early diagnosis and prevention strategies in clinical and research settings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation

Ruiz-Muñoz,

Fernández-Torres,

Formosa

et al. 2024

Front. Public Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, during the last 25 years, the patient's perspective has taken an important place in the evaluation of health services. 10,11 Thus, patients' perceptions are important aspects of assessing the quality of care provided and an essential part of evaluation and audit. [12][13][14][15][16] The interdisciplinary team approach has been associated with positive clinical outcomes for patients with a DFU in Canada based on observational studies, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] but also in terms of DFU care based on an evaluation based on Donabedian indicators of structure-processes-outcomes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on an Interdisciplinary Team Approach

Patry,

Bourgault,

Blanchette

2024

Journal of Wound, Ostomy &Amp; Continence Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients’ perception and quality of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care delivered by an interdisciplinary team approach (ITA). DESIGN: Exploratory cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Twenty patients with a healed plantar DFU were recruited from an interdisciplinary Wound Care clinic of a Canadian University affiliated hospital. Their mean age was 64 years (75% were males [n = 15]), 18 (90%) were living with type 2 diabetes, and 45% (n = 9) had osteomyelitis in the previous year of their enrollment in the study. METHODS: The validated short form of the Quality From the Patient’s Perspective questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of care dimensions (medical-technical competence of the caregivers; physical-technical conditions of the care organization; degree of identity-orientation in the attitudes and actions of the caregivers; and sociocultural atmosphere of the care organization). RESULTS: Respondents reported experiencing a high level of quality care with an ITA. All indicators of patient-perceived reality of care delivered were superior or equal related to their subjective importance in all dimensions of quality care (with scores ranging from 3.85 to 4.00 on a 4-Point Likert scale). Patients’ satisfaction regarding the ITA was high. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest that an ITA model provided high quality of care for treating DFUs for all quality dimensions judged important for patients.

show abstract

“…[14][15][16] Previous systematic reviews have summarized and analyzed the PROMs of QoL used in the spectrum of diabetes-related foot disease. [17][18][19][20][21] Nevertheless, Hogg et al 17 did not conduct their review following the COSMIN guidelines.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Quality of Life in People Affected by Diabetic Foot: A Psychometric Systematic Review

Romero-Collado

Hernández-Martínez-Esparza

Zabaleta‐del‐Olmo

et al. 2022

Value in Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures

Cited by 10 publications

References 58 publications

Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation

Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation

Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on an Interdisciplinary Team Approach

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Quality of Life in People Affected by Diabetic Foot: A Psychometric Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About